2021 3rd East Indonesia Conference on Computer and Information Technology (EIConCIT) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/eiconcit50028.2021.9431873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Efficient Fog Computing with Architecture of Smart Traffic Lights System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results demonstrate that the fog-based solution achieves significantly lower latency (around 14.74 ms with 30 cars and 15.64 ms with 60 cars) in contrast to the TLC-based architecture (104.43 ms with 30 cars and 108.32 ms with 60 cars), highlighting the potential of the fog-based approach in achieving efficient traffic light optimization. In another study [10], the authors propose an energy-efficient fog computing architecture for smart traffic lights. Their objective is to optimize energy consumption by leveraging fog computing techniques.…”
Section: Full Stack Simulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results demonstrate that the fog-based solution achieves significantly lower latency (around 14.74 ms with 30 cars and 15.64 ms with 60 cars) in contrast to the TLC-based architecture (104.43 ms with 30 cars and 108.32 ms with 60 cars), highlighting the potential of the fog-based approach in achieving efficient traffic light optimization. In another study [10], the authors propose an energy-efficient fog computing architecture for smart traffic lights. Their objective is to optimize energy consumption by leveraging fog computing techniques.…”
Section: Full Stack Simulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whenever the fog node is not processing any task, it is said to be in idle mode, and when it is executing any task, it is said to be in busy mode. The fog device's energy consumption is calculated in iFogSim using Equation (3). The energy consumption of the fog nodes (EC) is calculated using the current energy consumption E, the current time T c , the updated time during the last utilization T r , and the host power utilization HP r .…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cloud computing platforms for storing, processing, and analyzing the data generated from a large number of connected devices became a great innovation for the IoT, but this has brought many challenges with respect to their centralized architecture [1,2]. Due to the huge demand of IoT devices and location-aware services, applications are generating amounts of data that are almost inconceivable [3]. It has been estimated that the cloud alone may not be sufficient to handle the big data generated by IoT devices with respect to time-critical or emergency situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Edge computing is quite similar to fog computing but very few differences in terms of high security and a large volume of data transfer make fog computing so viable to use with UAVs. 10 It helps to provide a way for IoT systems to communicate and process a large volume of data at a time by offloading it via devices to fog nodes or devices to UAVs. UAVs have their grand contribution to military, civil, commercial, and industrial areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with other computing paradigms, fog computing has numerous benefits such as better connectivity, ultra‐low latency, security, data‐offloading, and cost. Edge computing is quite similar to fog computing but very few differences in terms of high security and a large volume of data transfer make fog computing so viable to use with UAVs 10 . It helps to provide a way for IoT systems to communicate and process a large volume of data at a time by offloading it via devices to fog nodes or devices to UAVs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%