Energy-efficient sensory data gathering based on compressed sensing in IoT networks

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) networks have become the infrastructure to enable the detection and reaction of anomalies in various domains, where an efficient sensory data gathering mechanism is fundamental since IoT nodes are typically constrained in their energy and computational capacities. Besides, anomalies may occur occasionally in most applications, while the majority of time durations may reflect a healthy situation. In this setting, the range, rather than an accurate value of sensory data, should be more interesting to domain applications, and the range is represented in terms of the category of sensory data. To decrease the energy consumption of IoT networks, this paper proposes an energy-efficient sensory data gathering mechanism, where the category of sensory data is processed by adopting the compressed sensing algorithm. The sensory data are forecasted through a data prediction model in the cloud, and sensory data of an IoT node is necessary to be routed to the cloud for the synchronization purpose, only when the category provided by this IoT node is different from the category of the forecasted one in the cloud. Experiments are conducted and evaluation results demonstrate that our approach performs better than state-of-the-art techniques, in terms of the network traffic and energy consumption.

A Novel Machine Language-Driven Data Aggregation Approach to Predict Data Redundancy in IoT-Connected Wireless Sensor Networks

“…This supports to accuracy improvements. Again, an energy-efficient data aggregation strategy is proposed in [14] in which IoT nodes encode sensor input into a binary format before routing. Next, the data is compressed at the edge node and then pumped into the IoT cloud through the shortest route.…”

Improving the Convergence Period of Adaptive Data Rate in a Long Range Wide Area Network for the Internet of Things Devices

“…The energy consumption is determined by dividing the overall energy spent by EDs during the simulation period by the number of packets successfully received [31,32]. We used the energy consumer module from [33] and the Semtech SX1272/73 datasheet with a 3.3 V supply voltage [21] in this paper.…”

Energy-Efficient Boundary Detection for Continuous Objects in Collaborative Edge Networks

“…Compared with terminal nodes, edge nodes contain more resources and have more computing power, they have higher initial energy and longer data transmission distance. [28]. The edge node can manage the terminal nodes within its communication range.…”

“…Edge nodes contain more resources than end nodes and have more computational power than terminal nodes. The initial energy of the edge node will also be greater than the energy of the terminal node, and the data transmission distance of the edge node is also longer than that of the terminal node [28]. Edge nodes can manage the terminal nodes within their communication range.…”