2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.87.123513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy injection and absorption in the cosmic dark ages

Abstract: Dark matter annihilation or de-excitation, decay of metastable species, or other new physics may inject energetic electrons and photons into the photon-baryon fluid during and after recombination. As such particles cool, they partition their energy into a large number of efficiently ionizing electrons and photons, which in turn modify the ionization history. Recent work has provided a simple method for constraining arbitrary energy deposition histories using the cosmic microwave background (CMB); in this note,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
188
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
7
188
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is referred to in Refs. [5] and [24] as taking a "dot product," but there is a subtlety here in that the dot product must be taken in the space defined by the 41 f sys ðzÞ curves, not in the space of functions of z. In the Fisher matrix approach, this corresponds to taking the dot product between the (discretized) f sys ðzÞ curve for that particular model and the vector ðeÞ T F, where e is the (discretized) universal eðzÞ curve and F is the marginalized Fisher matrix describing the effect on the CMB of energy depositions localized in redshift (see Ref.…”
Section: A Universal Energy Deposition Curve With Systematic Correctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is referred to in Refs. [5] and [24] as taking a "dot product," but there is a subtlety here in that the dot product must be taken in the space defined by the 41 f sys ðzÞ curves, not in the space of functions of z. In the Fisher matrix approach, this corresponds to taking the dot product between the (discretized) f sys ðzÞ curve for that particular model and the vector ðeÞ T F, where e is the (discretized) universal eðzÞ curve and F is the marginalized Fisher matrix describing the effect on the CMB of energy depositions localized in redshift (see Ref.…”
Section: A Universal Energy Deposition Curve With Systematic Correctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WMAP [4], SPT [5,6] and ACT [7]), and most recently by the Planck satellite [8], can thus place robust and modelindependent constraints on such energy injections (e.g. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the dark sector states are relatively heavy 100 MeV, constraints from collider observations easily allow decays before BBN [41]. Meanwhile, for lighter masses collider and astrophysics bounds require much longer decay times, and there is greater danger of observable energy injection [42], although again this may be allowed if the hidden sector temperature is relatively low. However, further study is required to ensure the coupling between the sectors does not disrupt freeze-in, and we leave this for future work.…”
Section: Dark Sectors With Annihilationsmentioning
confidence: 99%