1977
DOI: 10.1016/0092-640x(77)90042-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy levels and classifications of doubly-excited states in two-electron systems with nuclear charge, Z = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, below the N = 2 and N = 3 thresholds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

17
103
3

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
17
103
3
Order By: Relevance
“…; this is in good agreement with the value −0.7685 a.u. reported by the Lipsky et al [50] and the −0.7776 a.u. reported by Dulieu and Le Sech [51].…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…; this is in good agreement with the value −0.7685 a.u. reported by the Lipsky et al [50] and the −0.7776 a.u. reported by Dulieu and Le Sech [51].…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The diagonalization method is in principle cruder but easier to use than more sophisticated methods like numerical or analytic selfconsistent field approaches, and it has been used by many authors (e.g. [5][6][7][8]). This method has been developed in the frame of the Feshbach formalism and applied to the case of two active electron systems.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The one based on collisional approach treats the doubly excited states as quasi bound resonances embedded in scattering continuum. The close coupling method by Burkey and Taylor [37], Macek [38], Callaway [39] and Feshbach projection operator method and its different variants by Bhatia [40], Bhatia and Temkin [41], Lipski et al [42], Chung [43], Chung and Davies [44], Bachau [45], Oza [46], Macias et al [47] and Martin et al [48,49] are quite effective in calculating the position and width of the resonances. The other approach treats the doubly excited states as temporary bound states embedded in the continuum and accurate calculations were performed by the configuration interaction (CI) approach [14,[50][51][52], complex coordinate method by Ho and coworkers [53,54] and by hyperspherical coordinate approach [35,[55][56][57].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%