2017
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2017.2737229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Management and Power Allocation for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major difference in this study is that we employ the power allocation scheme for non-orthogonal multiple access while utilizing the orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) technique for UAC networks. In [33], the authors investigated the power allocation strategy for energy harvesting in UAC networks. They considered two scenarios for knowing the channel state information and applied stochastic dynamic programming to find the optimal power allocation for UAC networks.…”
Section: Differences In System Methodologies In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The major difference in this study is that we employ the power allocation scheme for non-orthogonal multiple access while utilizing the orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) technique for UAC networks. In [33], the authors investigated the power allocation strategy for energy harvesting in UAC networks. They considered two scenarios for knowing the channel state information and applied stochastic dynamic programming to find the optimal power allocation for UAC networks.…”
Section: Differences In System Methodologies In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major difference in this study is that we select the proper center frequency, bandwidth, and transmission using the routing protocols. Hence, the different approaches and system design in the existing works [32][33][34] resulted in different system parameters. Therefore, it is very difficult to compare the proposed DL PA strategy with other research.…”
Section: Differences In System Methodologies In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [13] applied a cluster-based method to exploit spatial and temporal correlations for data aggregation, in which the data collected by the sensors were transmitted to the data fusion center through a hierarchy of cluster heads that used wavelet decomposition to build the wavelet coefficients of the data. Jing et al [14] used a dynamic programming approach to decide the energy allocation ratio. Gonglaing et al [15] proposed interleave division multiple-access based compressed sensing for information acquisition with sensor networks to ensure the data transmission reliability of information map reconstruction.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the dynamic energy harvesting [ 16 ], Jiao et al developed a novel evolutionary algorithm to jointly optimize the data rates and power allocation to decrease the total network delay for wireless sensor networks. In Reference [ 17 ], Jing et al employed a channel-aware dynamic programming approach to allocate power to maximize capacity of EH-UASNs. In this approach, the authors concentrated on the distribution of battery energy for sensing and transmission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%