2020
DOI: 10.1080/15567036.2020.1809563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy metrics assessment of a photovoltaic thermal air collector (PVTAC): a comparison between flat and wavy collector

Abstract: In this paper, the performances of two different configurations of the PVT air collector (PVTAC) were studied and compared with respect to three energy matrices: energy payback time, electricity production factor and life cycle conversion efficiency.Geometrically, both configurations are similar except one equipped with a flat plate collector (PVTACF) and other with a wavy plate collector (PVTACW). An experimental investigation was performed for both the models, located at Silchar (Latitude: 24.8333° N and Lon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They conducted outdoor tests using wavy and plain absorbers with variable photovoltaic coverage under climatic conditions in Northeast India. Another study by Jha et al [24] compared the performance of two different configurations of a PVT air collector for three energy arrays, including energy recovery time, electricity production factor, and conversion efficiency of the Lifecycle.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They conducted outdoor tests using wavy and plain absorbers with variable photovoltaic coverage under climatic conditions in Northeast India. Another study by Jha et al [24] compared the performance of two different configurations of a PVT air collector for three energy arrays, including energy recovery time, electricity production factor, and conversion efficiency of the Lifecycle.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The embodied energy is the input energy required in production of raw materials to develop any system. It takes into account the total total consumption during the raw material to the final product and is calculated by the total energy density of each component times total mass of material used [42]. The distribution of embodied energy to fabricate the current developed system is mentioned in Table 7.…”
Section: Energy Payback Period Of the Developed Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculated embodied energy is used to calculate the energy payback time (EPBT). EPBT is the ratio of embodied energy (energy input) to the energy gained from the system (output energy) and it gives a measurement of the time required to pay back the expenses incurred in fabricating current system [42]. EPBT is found to be 7.4 years and 7.8 years incase of system without fin and system with fin, respectively.…”
Section: Energy Payback Period Of the Developed Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrical performance of PVTAC is also measured. The solar cell or PV module electrical efficiency (ηsc) is calculated as [35]:…”
Section: Energy Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall energy collected by the PVTAC (Qov) is the collection of thermal energy and conversion of electrical energy into thermal energy, which is calculated as [35]:…”
Section: Energy Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%