2011
DOI: 10.1177/0954410011408659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-optimal low-thrust satellite formation manoeuvre in presence of J2 perturbation

Abstract: This article proposes a method to determine energy-optimal low-thrust trajectories for satellite formation manoeuvre in the presence of the J2 effect. This manoeuvre is cast as a non-linear optimization problem with a desired final satellite formation configuration subjecting to collision avoidance constraint. With this proposed approach, the deputy satellite is manoeuvred into a quasi-periodic desired final formation with respect to the chief satellite in the presence of the J2 effect. Resulting non-linear op… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 otherwise (15) The term N ⋅ ∈ N denotes the number of finite-time maneuvers along the axis (⋅) within the interval u 0 ; u T , whereas u j c⋅;0 and u j c⋅;f indicate the mean argument of latitude of the chief orbit at the beginning and the end of the jth maneuver, respectively, or alternately the initial and final instant of time of the jth maneuver according to the relationship reported in Eq. (10). By assuming that the relative motion is well described by the linear model [Eqs.…”
Section: B Piecewise Constant Control Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 otherwise (15) The term N ⋅ ∈ N denotes the number of finite-time maneuvers along the axis (⋅) within the interval u 0 ; u T , whereas u j c⋅;0 and u j c⋅;f indicate the mean argument of latitude of the chief orbit at the beginning and the end of the jth maneuver, respectively, or alternately the initial and final instant of time of the jth maneuver according to the relationship reported in Eq. (10). By assuming that the relative motion is well described by the linear model [Eqs.…”
Section: B Piecewise Constant Control Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reconfiguration problem was posed as a multiplephase nonlinear optimal control problem and is solved via direct transcription using the Gauss pseudospectral method. Wu et al [10] presented a method to determine the fuel-optimal low-thrust trajectories for satellite formation maneuvers in presence of J 2 effect. The resulting nonlinear optimal control problem is converted into nonlinear programming (NLP) problem by the Legendre pseudospectral method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smooth approximate time-optimal attitude maneuver problem is then numerically solved by pseudospectral method, which has shown tremendous promise and has been applied to a wide variety of optimal control applications. [2][3][4][5][9][10][11][12][20][21][22][23] In order to attain robust performance, a closed-loop tracking control law is applied to track the optimized reference attitude trajectory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another hot topic for proximity operations is collision-avoidance maneuver. For this problem, various guidance and path planning technologies have been investigated in literature, such as artificial potential functions, [5][6][7] pseudo-spectral methods, [8][9][10] samplingbased methods, 11,12 heuristic algorithms, 13,14 mixedinteger linear programming, 15 model predictive control (MPC), [16][17][18][19][20] and PDF methods. [21][22][23] Some methods 8,18,19,[21][22][23] have involved the effects of uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%