2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy optimization methodology of multi-chiller plant in commercial buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Most PMSs rely on complex optimization methods [31][32][33], which require a high computational effort and make the deployment on existing controllers so difficult that often the rules of these PMSs can be only tested on simulated plants. Other commercial software uses relational control, based on the equal marginal performance principle [34].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most PMSs rely on complex optimization methods [31][32][33], which require a high computational effort and make the deployment on existing controllers so difficult that often the rules of these PMSs can be only tested on simulated plants. Other commercial software uses relational control, based on the equal marginal performance principle [34].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many attempts to reduce energy consumption for the chiller systems including by using multiple linear regression analysis, interaction analysis of each components, and data-driven analysis [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a 24 h time horizon, the energy savings are around 9.4% and the energy costs savings are 17.4%. [16] A literature review reveals that the energy-saving potential varies between 5% [17] and 40% [18] depending on the case study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%