Energy performance of perovskite solar cell fabrication in Argentina. A life cycle assessment approach

Guerrero, Natalia B. Correa; Martínez, Walter O. Herrera; Civit, Bárbara María; Pérez, María Dolores

doi:10.1016/j.solener.2021.10.071

Cited by 15 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In prior work, the EPBT was reported to be significantly lower for thin-film photovoltaics than perovskite solar panels. − Our results point to a range of possible EPBT values, based on different embedded energy estimates taken from the literature. − The resulting calculated EPBTs range from 2.2 years in Poland to 1.2 years in Spain for ground-mount perovskite systems. The EPBTs ranges from 1.1 to 0.6 years for a perovskite solar panel without installation costs (Table S10).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 57%

Design and Cost Analysis of 100 MW Perovskite Solar Panel Manufacturing Process in Different Locations

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 57%

Design and Cost Analysis of 100 MW Perovskite Solar Panel Manufacturing Process in Different Locations

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…APEG has been determined to be 97.62 kW h·m –2 ·year –1 , giving an EPBT of 0.53 years. Recently, EPBT of lead-based perovskite solar module (Pb-PSM) has been calculated to be in the range of 0.97–1.74 years . The maximum PCE of the MAPbI 3 PSC with PEDOT/PSS and PCBM transport layers is 18% .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Recently, EPBT of lead-based perovskite solar module (Pb-PSM) has been calculated to be in the range of 0.97−1.74 years. 67 The maximum PCE of the MAPbI 3 PSC with PEDOT/PSS and PCBM transport layers is 18%. 68 The TPED of the Pb-PSM has been calculated to be 787.17 MJ• m −2 , as given in Tables 7 and 8.…”

Section: Effect Of Ag Nps Embedded In Both the Absorber And Electron ...mentioning

confidence: 98%

Efficiency Enhancement and Life Cycle Assessment of 2D/3D Mixed-Dimensional Tin Perovskite Plasmonic Solar Cells

Purkayastha,

Minz,

Sonkar

et al. 2024

ACS Appl. Electron. Mater.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this work, the impact of spherical silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) on the performance of mixed-dimensional tin perovskite solar cells (Sn-PSCs) was explored using Silvaco 2D TCAD and Lumerical software. Embedding 10 nm spherical Ag NPs within the electron transport layer at the cathode interface led to an increase of 8.65% boost in photocurrent density (J PH ) through a plasmonic effect, resulting in a maximum power conversion efficiency of 23.16%. However, the presence of metal NPs in the hole transport layer reduced the absorption efficiency of the active layer. Notably, our experiments revealed that the mixed-dimensional Sn PSCs (0.15 M phenylethylammonium iodide in precursor solution) displayed an average grain size of 257 nm, surpassing that of the 3D Sn PSCs by 48.55%. Additionally, XRD studies showed that these mixed-dimensional films exhibited a minimized full width at half-maximum value of 0.342°for the (100) perovskite plane, confirming superior crystallinity compared to other types of films. Furthermore, material and energy inventories have been developed for a tin perovskite solar module (Sn-PSM) embedded with Ag NPs, facilitating a comprehensive life cycle assessment. The total primary energy demand (TPED) for the development of Sn-PSM was estimated to be 643.98 MJ•m −2 . The production of ITO glass contributes to nearly 37.09% of the TPED and is the major bottleneck for reducing the energy consumption. The deposition of PEDOT/PSS and FASnI 3 (spin coating and annealing) accounted for 33.30 and 34.99% of the energy required, respectively, for module fabrication. The energy payback time has been predicted to be 0.53 years, which is lower by 34.57 and 75.90% compared to those of lead-based solar module (Pb-PSM) and c-Si solar modules, respectively. Furthermore, the greenhouse gas emission factor has been evaluated to be 0.07 kg-CO 2 •kW h −1 , indicating substantial reductions by 36.36 and 77.85% when compared to those of Pb-PSM and c-Si solar modules, respectively.

show abstract

“…26 Due to their high efficiency and low production energy needs, PSCs may have a shorter energy payback period than other solar cell technologies, increasing their environmental sustainability. 26,[52][53][54][55] PSCs are very promising, but challenges remain to be solved like scabble synthesis of other materials with greater output, [56][57][58][59] particularly regarding long-term stability, scalability, and commercialization.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dimensional diversity (0D, 1D, 2D, and 3D) in perovskite solar cells: exploring the potential of mixed-dimensional integrations

Li,

Aftab,

Hussain

et al. 2024

J. Mater. Chem. A

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Energy performance of perovskite solar cell fabrication in Argentina. A life cycle assessment approach

Cited by 15 publications

References 50 publications

Design and Cost Analysis of 100 MW Perovskite Solar Panel Manufacturing Process in Different Locations

Design and Cost Analysis of 100 MW Perovskite Solar Panel Manufacturing Process in Different Locations

Efficiency Enhancement and Life Cycle Assessment of 2D/3D Mixed-Dimensional Tin Perovskite Plasmonic Solar Cells

Dimensional diversity (0D, 1D, 2D, and 3D) in perovskite solar cells: exploring the potential of mixed-dimensional integrations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About