2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10657-009-9098-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy prices and emissions trading: windfall profits from grandfathering?

Abstract: The greenhouse gas emissions trading scheme in the European Union primarily uses grandfathering until 2012, which means that polluters get emission rights free of charge based on their historical emissions. Energy consumers accuse energy producers of making windfall profits by incorporating the market value of those free rights into the energy prices. However, we develop a numerical example to illustrate that the reasoning of the producers is correct. We also explain why this market value is only partly passed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Energy-intensive companies obtain a large number of emission permits through the grandfather rule and make profits through the carbon emission market (Woerdman et al, 2009). When 1 À λ < θ, the more relaxed emission intensity of the industry, the greater the profits of the firm i under the benchmarking rules, because the high-energy intensity reduces abatement costs.…”
Section: Results Comparingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy-intensive companies obtain a large number of emission permits through the grandfather rule and make profits through the carbon emission market (Woerdman et al, 2009). When 1 À λ < θ, the more relaxed emission intensity of the industry, the greater the profits of the firm i under the benchmarking rules, because the high-energy intensity reduces abatement costs.…”
Section: Results Comparingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, Mayer Hillman and Tina Fawcett introduced the term Personal Carbon Allowances [10]. These two proposals, Tradable Energy Quotas and Personal Carbon Allowances, are the most discussed PCT proposals [11]; nonetheless, other PCT proposals have been brought forward by researchers [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. As these contributions investigated optimal designs for PCT schemes, others have investigated the public acceptance of a PCT scheme [19] and how to best integrate a PCT scheme into policy agendas [20][21][22].…”
Section: Status Of Pct Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The free allocation will, at least for a couple more years, continue to provide a protection from carbon leakage, but also lower the incentive for switching away from the blast furnace and thus losing eligibility to the blast furnace benchmark. Regardless of the incentive provided by the EU ETS, evidence suggest that they still only form a marginal incentive to innovate for industries (Woerdman et al, 2009;Laing et al, 2013) rather than a raison d'être supporting any transition to lower emission intensity technology. Instead, from the industry association literature, the vision of 'zero fossil use' was inspired by both the climate law and the Paris agreement and reflection about how industry could fit into such a world.…”
Section: Direction Of Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%