2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.12.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy savings from temperature setpoints and deadband: Quantifying the influence of building and system properties on savings

Abstract: This paper provides a systematic approach for quantifying the influence of building size, construction category, climate, occupancy schedule, setpoint, and deadband on HVAC energy consumption in office buildings. Simulating the DOE reference office buildings of three sizes and three construction categories in all United States climate zones, using the EnergyPlus, we conducted several N-way ANOVA analyses to study the interrelationships between setpoints, deadbands and several building related and environment r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
93
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows to further improve the energy efficiency in buildings. The potential energy savings from optimizing the building HVAC temperature setpoints can reach up to 37% [14] depending on the climate, building size, and materials. While the more sophisticated optimization and control algorithms might help improving the energy efficiency and thermal comfort, there is a trade-off between the controller complexity and the potential energy savings [45][46][47][48], which requires further investigations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This allows to further improve the energy efficiency in buildings. The potential energy savings from optimizing the building HVAC temperature setpoints can reach up to 37% [14] depending on the climate, building size, and materials. While the more sophisticated optimization and control algorithms might help improving the energy efficiency and thermal comfort, there is a trade-off between the controller complexity and the potential energy savings [45][46][47][48], which requires further investigations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though it is difficult to assess human comfort in real-time due to these factors, building HVAC systems energy consumption can still be optimized while occupants thermal comfort is wellmaintained [9] as humans perceive comfort in a range of environmental thermal conditions [10][11][12]. It is worth mentioning that small thermal comfort related adjustments (e.g., adjusting the temperature set point by 1°C) have considerable impacts on the overall building energy consumption [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the centralized system is then responsible for maintaining ambient conditions within a range in which the PCS can correct for each individual's thermal comfort needs, instead of a much narrower range that is a compromise for all occupants in that space. The wider range of acceptable ambient temperature conditions will allow HVAC systems to operate under a wider temperature setpoints, leading to significant energy savings [54][55][56][57].…”
Section: Connected Pcs Chair and Continuous Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Korkas et al [21] presented a novel control algorithm for joint thermal comfort optimization and DSM in microgrids with RES and TES. Conversely, [22] focused on quantifying the potential energy savings in HVAC systems through setpoint and deadband changes. This study also considered the effects of some influential factors on building HVAC energy consumption using building energy simulations.…”
Section: Reported Cost Savingsmentioning
confidence: 99%