2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40571-020-00326-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy-tracking impulse method for particle-discretized rigid-body simulations with frictional contact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An extension to a macroscale approach, i.e., a normal distance-based contact interaction [12,52,53], is possible in a straightforward manner. In addition, also a momentum-based energy tracking method [54] was recently applied for collision modeling of fully resolved rigid bodies [55,56].…”
Section: Remark 18mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extension to a macroscale approach, i.e., a normal distance-based contact interaction [12,52,53], is possible in a straightforward manner. In addition, also a momentum-based energy tracking method [54] was recently applied for collision modeling of fully resolved rigid bodies [55,56].…”
Section: Remark 18mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on Nietzsche's method, Fabre et al (2016) developed a finite element fictitious domain approach for the approximation of frictionless contact problems of two elastic bodies. Li et al (2021) suggested an energytracking impulse (ETI) algorithm. The improved ETI method is verified by the analytical solutions of monomer contact, friction slip and rolling contact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2016) developed a finite element fictitious domain approach for the approximation of frictionless contact problems of two elastic bodies. Li et al. (2021) suggested an energy-tracking impulse (ETI) algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for fluid and solid modeling, we have smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method (Gingold & Monaghan, 1977;Lucy, 1977), and moving particle semi-implicit (MPS) method (Koshizuka & Oka, 1996). Nowadays, there are innumerous variations of these two methods (Li et al, 2020;Lind et al, 2020). Besides the difference between the discrete operators Based on contact mechanics theories, the objective of this work is to propose a solid-solid contact model for the particle-based methods, especially for the MPS method, by adopting a nonlinear spring and dashpot model for solid-solid contact, similar to that adopted by Canelas et al (2016), but with newly defined normal direction and distance of contact vectors to improve the numerical stability, and therefore reproducing the macroscopic properties of the multiple bodies interactions in transient incompressible flows involving free surface and impulsive hydrodynamic loads.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%