2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2015.02.090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy transfer based emission analysis of (Tb3+, Sm3+): Lithium zinc phosphate glasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Ho 3+ single doped glass SFAC: 0.8H, eight absorption bands peaking at ~361, 386, 418, 453, 472, 485, 537, and 641 nm are clearly distinguished, which are attributed to the excitation from 5 I 8 ground state to the 3 H 6 , 5 G 4 , 5 G 5 , 5 G 6 + 5 F 1 , 5 F 2 , 5 F 3 , 5 S 2 + 5 F 4 , and 5 F 5 excited states of Ho 3+ ions, respectively. For the Sm 3+ single doped glass SFAC: 0.1S, the absorption peak at 401 nm is induced by the electronic transition 6 H 5/2 → 4 F 7/2 of Sm 3+ ions . The absorption spectrum of SFAC: 0.1C is due to the 4f → 5d electronic transition of Ce 3+ ions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For Ho 3+ single doped glass SFAC: 0.8H, eight absorption bands peaking at ~361, 386, 418, 453, 472, 485, 537, and 641 nm are clearly distinguished, which are attributed to the excitation from 5 I 8 ground state to the 3 H 6 , 5 G 4 , 5 G 5 , 5 G 6 + 5 F 1 , 5 F 2 , 5 F 3 , 5 S 2 + 5 F 4 , and 5 F 5 excited states of Ho 3+ ions, respectively. For the Sm 3+ single doped glass SFAC: 0.1S, the absorption peak at 401 nm is induced by the electronic transition 6 H 5/2 → 4 F 7/2 of Sm 3+ ions . The absorption spectrum of SFAC: 0.1C is due to the 4f → 5d electronic transition of Ce 3+ ions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Our experimental results indicated that energy transfer occurs between Tb 3+ and Sm 3+ ions. Spectral overlapping between the Sm 3+ absorption and the Tb 3+ emission spectra shows that the energy transfer occurs from Tb 3+ to Sm 3+ [43]. It's known that the absorption band around 477 nm of Sm 3+ ion overlap with the emission band of Tb 3+ around 488 nm [35].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The value of η Dy /η Dy-Eu ratio can be approximated to the ratio of emission intensities (I Dy /I Dy-Eu ) and decay lifetimes (τ Dy /τ Dy-Eu ) for the present co-doping system. Therefore, using the decay lifetimes, the relations can be written as Equation (4) 59,63,64 : ), where n stands for 6, 8, and 10. The lifetimes versus concentration result showed a linear trend for n = 6, 8, and 10, with the best fit for n = 6, demonstrating the electric dipole-dipole interaction is liable for ET from Dy 3+ to Eu 3+ in the KZnBP glass.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of η Dy / η Dy‐Eu ratio can be approximated to the ratio of emission intensities ( I Dy / I Dy‐Eu ) and decay lifetimes ( τ Dy / τ Dy‐Eu ) for the present co‐doping system. Therefore, using the decay lifetimes, the relations can be written as Equation () 59,63,64 : τDy/τDyEuCn/3,$$\begin{equation}{\tau }_{{\rm{Dy}}}/{\tau }_{{\rm{Dy}} - {\rm{Eu}}} \propto {C}^{n/3},\end{equation}$$where τ Dy and τ Dy–Eu refer to the Dy 3+ lifetimes, co‐doped without and with Eu 3+ , respectively. The graph between τnormalDfalse(Dy3+false)/τnormalD(Dy3+)A(Eu3+)${\tau }_{{\rm{D}}( {{\rm{Dy}}^{3 + }} )}/{\tau }_{{\rm{D}}( {{\rm{Dy}}^{3 + }} ) - {\rm{A\ }}( {{\rm{Eu}}^{3 + }} )}$and0.33em${\rm{\ and}}\ $CDfalse(Dy3+false)+Afalse(Eu3+false)n/3$C_{{\rm{D}}( {{\rm{Dy}}^{3 + }} ) + {\rm{A}}( {{\rm{Eu}}^{3 + }} )}^{n/3}$ was used to determine the multipole–multipole interaction, facilitating the ET process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%