2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy utilization and carbon dioxide emission in the fresh, paste, whole-peeled, diced, and juiced tomato production processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Historically, LCAs assessing greenhouse operations for fresh tomato, not processing tomato, have been completed for a number of locations including Spain (Martínez-Blanco et al 2011;Torrellas et al 2012), Canada (Dias et al 2017), Italy (Cellura et al 2012), southern and central Europe (Ntinas et al 2017), and Australia (Page et al 2012). An LCA of processing tomato has been conducted for cultivation in Italy (Del Borghi et al 2014;De Marco et al 2018), Greece (Ntinas et al 2017), Turkey (Karakaya and Özilgen 2011), and with limited data and impact categories in California (Brodt et al 2013). Processing facility operations for tomatoes have been assessed with LCA in Italy (Del Borghi et al 2014), Turkey (Karakaya and Özilgen 2011), and California (Amón and Simmons 2016;Brodt et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Historically, LCAs assessing greenhouse operations for fresh tomato, not processing tomato, have been completed for a number of locations including Spain (Martínez-Blanco et al 2011;Torrellas et al 2012), Canada (Dias et al 2017), Italy (Cellura et al 2012), southern and central Europe (Ntinas et al 2017), and Australia (Page et al 2012). An LCA of processing tomato has been conducted for cultivation in Italy (Del Borghi et al 2014;De Marco et al 2018), Greece (Ntinas et al 2017), Turkey (Karakaya and Özilgen 2011), and with limited data and impact categories in California (Brodt et al 2013). Processing facility operations for tomatoes have been assessed with LCA in Italy (Del Borghi et al 2014), Turkey (Karakaya and Özilgen 2011), and California (Amón and Simmons 2016;Brodt et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An LCA of processing tomato has been conducted for cultivation in Italy (Del Borghi et al 2014;De Marco et al 2018), Greece (Ntinas et al 2017), Turkey (Karakaya and Özilgen 2011), and with limited data and impact categories in California (Brodt et al 2013). Processing facility operations for tomatoes have been assessed with LCA in Italy (Del Borghi et al 2014), Turkey (Karakaya and Özilgen 2011), and California (Amón and Simmons 2016;Brodt et al 2013). For processing tomato cultivation, most studies identified the primary hotspots for improvement in environmental impacts as fossil fuel use, electricity for irrigation, and fertilizer production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aproximadamente, 126 milhões de toneladas de tomate são produzidos no mundo anualmente e, deste total, mais de 30 milhões de toneladas são processadas (KARAKAYAA; ÖZILGEN, 2011). O consumo de produtos de tomate fresco ou processado está associado com a diminuição do risco de ocorrência de alguns tipos de câncer e com menor incidência de doenças cardíacas (ELLINGER; ELLINGER; STEHLE, 2006;WILLCOX;CATIGNANI;LAZARUS, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…In the first application, we referred to data from technical literature [8,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29], to the software SimaPro [21], and to databases connected to it [22,23]. The only exception was that related to waste production after food consumption, as it strictly depends on users' behavior and habits.…”
Section: Data Integration: the Survey For Food Wastementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The table shows the impacts related to the main stages of the supply chain related to some of the foods of the case study menu (the distances between the nodes is 250 km/node). The sources used to compile the database are associated with individual numerical values for the Cumulative Energy Demand (CED) and the Global Warming Potential (GWP 100 ): a [23], b [28], c [29], d [8], e [25]. The application of the FCM to the weekly menu allows the calculation of the environmental impacts of the different foods.…”
Section: Identification Of the Environmental Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%