2018
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engaging patients and family members in the evaluation of a mental health patient portal: protocol for a mixed-methods study

Abstract: IntroductionTwenty per cent of Canadians will experience a mental illness in any year. Mental health patient portals have been developed to support these individuals in taking more control over their own mental health and care. This may be done through electronic access to their health records and other supportive functions like completion of online self-assessments. To date, there has been limited research into the value that these portals may provide within mental health contexts. This study will identify wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…43 In another ongoing initiative, researchers are involving patients and their family members in the design and execution of a mixed methods study that will evaluate the value of behavioral health patient portals. 44 Using portal usage data, a literature review, patient/family focus groups, a daylong symposium, and outcomes data, researchers and their patient counterparts are cocreating a resource describing best practices for patient-researcher partnerships applicable to technologybased research initiatives in a broad range of clinical areas. 45 Such collaborations will improve the potential for developing patient-and clinician-friendly tools that support Learning Health System goals to align research and clinical care in an informatics-based ecosystem to drive a cycle of continuous advancement.…”
Section: Novel Patient-researcher Partnerships In Technology-enabled mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43 In another ongoing initiative, researchers are involving patients and their family members in the design and execution of a mixed methods study that will evaluate the value of behavioral health patient portals. 44 Using portal usage data, a literature review, patient/family focus groups, a daylong symposium, and outcomes data, researchers and their patient counterparts are cocreating a resource describing best practices for patient-researcher partnerships applicable to technologybased research initiatives in a broad range of clinical areas. 45 Such collaborations will improve the potential for developing patient-and clinician-friendly tools that support Learning Health System goals to align research and clinical care in an informatics-based ecosystem to drive a cycle of continuous advancement.…”
Section: Novel Patient-researcher Partnerships In Technology-enabled mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further details can be found in the protocol paper published in BMJ Open . 29 This work is informed by the Canadian Institute of Health Research Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Framework, 30 which outlines key principles for engaging patients to improve care delivery through research. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Board at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (REB 044/2018) and the University of Toronto (REB No.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the sample size calculation outlined in the protocol, about 100 patients (accounting for ∼30% attrition) were required for the study. 29 A sample size of N = 68 completers achieved 80% power (alpha = 5%) for detecting a 30% drop in World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) from baseline to T2 (equivalent to a small to medium effect size of Cohen's d = 0.27). All participants provided informed consent in written form as outlined in the REDCap eConsent recommendations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Technology-associated change impacts many areas of clinical care, training, and faculty development [14,23]. Areas being explored include the computer-based patient record or electronic health record (EHR) (e.g., workflow time and burnout) [24], adjustments of educational Milestones [25], technology-assisted clinical handoffs [13], social media use [16], electronic health portals [26], artificial intelligence for diagnosis [27], registries for clinical care and research [20], ediaries for longitudinal collection of patient symptoms [28], and use of email, apps, and games [20,29,30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%