SAE Technical Paper Series 1996
DOI: 10.4271/960636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engine Flow Calculations Using a Reynolds Stress Model in the Kiva-II Code

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…POD is the decomposition of a time dependent velocity field u(x,t) (or scalar distribution) into a linear combination of M spatial basis functions; POD modes denoted by ψ (k) (x) and time-dependent coefficients a (k) (t), as defined in equation (3) (3) Where k = 1,2,…,M.…”
Section: The Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…POD is the decomposition of a time dependent velocity field u(x,t) (or scalar distribution) into a linear combination of M spatial basis functions; POD modes denoted by ψ (k) (x) and time-dependent coefficients a (k) (t), as defined in equation (3) (3) Where k = 1,2,…,M.…”
Section: The Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally a Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) approach to turbulence modelling has been used in ICE 3D-CFD modelling [2,3] due to fairy high Reynolds numbers, immaturity of Sub-Grid Scale (SGS) closure models and insufficient computing power, but this approach has inherent limitations. The time or Favre weighted averaging techniques cause information related to the fluctuating component of the flow field to be lost, making investigations into unsteady phenomenon like CCV difficult at best.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other turbulence representations have been explored, including complex Reynolds stress transport models [20,21], but lack of widespread use suggests that the benefits, if any, are marginal. Given that a similar picture exists in other areas of CFD application, this is scarcely surprising.…”
Section: Turbulence Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The practical utility of these models, which require very high computational power, may be questionable in those cases where many repeated computations are involved, as in design applications. Moreover, their quantitative precision, which require an appropriate "balanced precision" in all their sub-models, could even be inadequate for some applications 26 . By a literature analysis on the models devoted to engine control applications, an articulate picture emerges concerning structure, goals and complexity 1,4,5,9 , ranging from input-output black-box models, mostly oriented to control design, to gray-box mean-value models, with a simplified description of the most relevant physical processes 1,2,3 , up to complex 3-D fluid-dynamic models 4,5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By a literature analysis on the models devoted to engine control applications, an articulate picture emerges concerning structure, goals and complexity 1,4,5,9 , ranging from input-output black-box models, mostly oriented to control design, to gray-box mean-value models, with a simplified description of the most relevant physical processes 1,2,3 , up to complex 3-D fluid-dynamic models 4,5 . These classes of model substantially differ in terms of computational time and experimental data required: for the validation of the simplest black-box models, hundreds or thousands of engine data could be needed to compensate for the lack of physical information, resulting in high experimental effort and lower model flexibility; on the other hands, the computational cost of the detailed 3-D models is not yet compatible with most control applications, and their predictivity still questionable 26 . From these considerations, it emerges that in many cases a suitable solution could be represented by the adoption of a mixed approach, in order to combine the advantages of various kind of models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%