SAE Technical Paper Series 2014
DOI: 10.4271/2014-01-1204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engine Parameter Optimization for Improved Engine and Drive Cycle Efficiency for Boosted, GDI Engines with Different Boosting System Architecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within 30 minutes values increase more than 50 fold. From this point onwards, the increase levels off and maximum values larger than 1·10 6 1/cm 3 are reached. The overall highest particle concentrations are produced by Fuel A with numbers larger than 2.4·10 6 1/cm 3 .…”
Section: Engine Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within 30 minutes values increase more than 50 fold. From this point onwards, the increase levels off and maximum values larger than 1·10 6 1/cm 3 are reached. The overall highest particle concentrations are produced by Fuel A with numbers larger than 2.4·10 6 1/cm 3 .…”
Section: Engine Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, the charge cooling effect observed during fuel injection allows for the use of higher compression ratios, with reduced risk of knocking. These benefits are gaining more attention with the continuing trend of downsizing and super-or turbocharging of engines, due to increasingly strict emissions regulations [5,6,7]. Additional benefits of GDI are the option to completely shut-off fuel supply while coasting [8] and improved cold start behaviour compared to PFI engines [9,10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ity challenges associated with turbocharging but at the expense of lower engine fuel economy. Including a supercharger in a turbocharged powertrain or twincharging can combine the drivability pros of supercharging with fuel economy benefits of turbocharging [2][3][4].…”
Section: Dscc2016-9691mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of different boosting system configurations on the performance and the fuel economy of downsized boosted gasoline direct-injection (GDI) engines were also investigated. 13 Three different two-stage boosting systems (a twin-turbocharger boosting system, an SC–TC boosting system and a TC–SC boosting system) were evaluated for a 1.2 l three-cylinder GDI engine in order to make a comparison with a 1.6 l four-cylinder GDI engine with a single-stage boosting system (a turbocharger or a clutched supercharger). Transient vehicle simulations predicted that the three-cylinder engine with further downsizing and two-stage boosting improved the fuel economy over the New European Driving Cycle, the Federal Test Procedure 75 driving cycle and the US06 driving cycle; in particular, the SC–TC system offered the greatest fuel economy benefits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%