2016
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201604281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineered Elastomer Substrates for Guided Assembly of Complex 3D Mesostructures by Spatially Nonuniform Compressive Buckling

Abstract: Approaches capable of creating three-dimensional (3D) mesostructures in advanced materials (device-grade semiconductors, electroactive polymers etc.) are of increasing interest in modern materials research. A versatile set of approaches exploits transformation of planar precursors into 3D architectures through the action of compressive forces associated with release of prestrain in a supporting elastomer substrate. Although a diverse set of 3D structures can be realized in nearly any class of material in this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, with carefully configured residual‐stress layers, complex buckling modes can produce previously inaccessible 3D structures . Second, elastomeric substrates with engineered distributions of thickness yield desired strain distributions, and thus complex 3D structures were obtained by compressive buckling . It is worth noting that the driving force may not come from the substrate at all.…”
Section: Nanomembrane Origamimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, with carefully configured residual‐stress layers, complex buckling modes can produce previously inaccessible 3D structures . Second, elastomeric substrates with engineered distributions of thickness yield desired strain distributions, and thus complex 3D structures were obtained by compressive buckling . It is worth noting that the driving force may not come from the substrate at all.…”
Section: Nanomembrane Origamimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning that, although the self‐folding behavior of bilayers is often thought to be one involving simple unidirectional bending,[39] the nature of bilayer morphing strongly depends on its geometric parameters and structural instabilities. [40–42] We rely on a finite element modeling (FEM)[43–47] guided approach as the FE models enable us to understand the mechanics behind the bilayer shape transformation behavior and the relationships between initial geometries, applied stimulus, and transformed shapes. We also fabricate millimeter‐scaled hinge‐less poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) bilayers with different cross‐linking densities (Figure S1, Supporting Information) and transform them into complex 3D configurations such as those representing letters from the Roman alphabet, quasi‐axisymmetric flower petal‐like structures, and open/ closed polyhedral architectures with varying number of faces (through solvent‐induced swelling experiments).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this technique, dynamic control of the interfacial adhesion between the stamp and the object to be transferred plays a crucial role in completing successful transfer printing. As shown in Table 1 , several strategies for adhesion control of transfer printing technique have been proposed and applied in the stretchable bioelectronics fabrication (e.g., complex 3D mesostructures,14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 wireless biomedical devices,17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 and epidermal sensor systems23, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%