2020
DOI: 10.1186/s41018-020-00073-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering and humanitarian intervention: learning from failure

Abstract: In this paper, we challenge the belief that failure is necessarily a bad outcome. Instead, we argue that failurespecifically articulated as productive failure-should rather be seen as an educational moment and learning opportunity. Furthermore, we examine the field of humanitarian engineering to argue that the failures of various humanitarian engineering interventions are not necessarily because of flaws in the design process but due to the dominance of the mainstream development discourse, which obscures the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(21 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FGD series started with reaching an agreement on certain terminologies. Some of the terminologies were based on the cited literature (Borhan et al, 2021; "UN Sustainable Development Goals", n.d.; Sahib et al, 2017;Arshad-Ayaz et al, 2020;Carew & Cooper, 2008;Engineering Accreditation Council (EAC), 2020). Table 1 presents the summary of the important terminologies that were discussed.…”
Section: Summary From Focus Group Discussion (Fgd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FGD series started with reaching an agreement on certain terminologies. Some of the terminologies were based on the cited literature (Borhan et al, 2021; "UN Sustainable Development Goals", n.d.; Sahib et al, 2017;Arshad-Ayaz et al, 2020;Carew & Cooper, 2008;Engineering Accreditation Council (EAC), 2020). Table 1 presents the summary of the important terminologies that were discussed.…”
Section: Summary From Focus Group Discussion (Fgd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivations primarily based on opportunities to travel abroad or experience new cultures, if translated to practice, can reinforce views of development based on colonialism and privilege, where the Humanitarian Engineer is engaging for their own benefit in terms of travel and experiences, particularly when international [26]. This is in contrast to strengths-based approaches, where the role of a Humanitarian Engineer is to constantly reflect on their role and position within a project [24]. Based on the findings in this study and the literature, reinforcement and reflection of motivation are critical for retention in HumEng programs as well as for the recruitment process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences in definitions may help guide researchers to consider the human dimension of HumEng at the very early stages of HumEng theory and development alongside the technical dimension regarding engineering practice through problem-solving. A focus on problem-solving can also lead to a deficit approach to development, looking for individual problems and issues to be solved rather than focusing on promoting human development and well-being [24]. This is in contrast to a strengths-or assets-based approach, which places greater emphasis on local communities and individuals and building from existing resources, strengths, and skills [25].…”
Section: Motivations To Be Humanitarian Engineersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the intricacies of failure of such systems are complex, one thing is very clear: these failures are not so much due to technical issues with the DER systems, as to a lack of consideration of the non-technical aspects of the communities for whom these systems were built [9]. It is important to understand that social aspects are equally relevant for success [10].…”
Section: The Importance Of Context Of Place and Peoplementioning
confidence: 99%