2010
DOI: 10.4155/bfs.10.46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering bacterial processes for cellulosic ethanol production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 157 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, microbes other than the widely used model organisms, such as Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, are being evaluated for their prospective abilities to act as production hosts. Thermophilic organisms are of particular interest due to their multiple advantages over mesophilic organisms when being used as production hosts. For example, their ability to grow and ferment at thermophilic temperatures reduces the cooling costs, , and increase substrate and product solubility, it reduces the contamination risk with mesophiles, and there are examples of using thermophiles for nonsterilized fermentations which would reduce sterilization costs, , additionally, the fermentation process runs at the optimum temperature for enzymatic lignocellulose degradation, allowing for efficient simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. , However, the use of nonmodel thermophiles as production hosts is generally hampered by the lack of well-developed genome editing tools compared to those available for currently used mesophilic model organisms. , …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, microbes other than the widely used model organisms, such as Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, are being evaluated for their prospective abilities to act as production hosts. Thermophilic organisms are of particular interest due to their multiple advantages over mesophilic organisms when being used as production hosts. For example, their ability to grow and ferment at thermophilic temperatures reduces the cooling costs, , and increase substrate and product solubility, it reduces the contamination risk with mesophiles, and there are examples of using thermophiles for nonsterilized fermentations which would reduce sterilization costs, , additionally, the fermentation process runs at the optimum temperature for enzymatic lignocellulose degradation, allowing for efficient simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. , However, the use of nonmodel thermophiles as production hosts is generally hampered by the lack of well-developed genome editing tools compared to those available for currently used mesophilic model organisms. , …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E. coli has been genetically altered to produce ethanol since 1987 [57]. In 2010, E. coli was genetically modified to express the Vitreoscilla hemoglobin for direct fermentation of sugar to ethanol [58].…”
Section: Other Fermentation Organismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Z. mobilis is amply considered since it has been genetically modified to obtain ethanol by cofermentation of several substrates like glucose, xylose and arabinose. This topics have been reviewed elsewhere (Kambam & Henson, 2010;Vinuselvi et al, 2011). For the production of liquid biofuels, mainly ethanol, sequential or simultaneous operational configurations between the hydrolysis or saccharification and fermentation stages have been adopted.…”
Section: Biotransformation Of Lignocellulosic Materials Into Alternatimentioning
confidence: 99%