28th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference 2010
DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-4398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering methods for SACCON configuration - Some Design Considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mass values have been estimated for Taranis and Neuron by estimating the payload based on similar configurations, as well as by averaging the payload and empty weight ratios of various demonstrators and concepts available in the literature. (Petterson, 2006;Tomac et al, 2010;Verhaagen, 2011). Computationally expensive CFD solvers are often employed in single design point studies; however this approach is not practical for large design space exploration studies at a conceptual design level.…”
Section: Mass Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mass values have been estimated for Taranis and Neuron by estimating the payload based on similar configurations, as well as by averaging the payload and empty weight ratios of various demonstrators and concepts available in the literature. (Petterson, 2006;Tomac et al, 2010;Verhaagen, 2011). Computationally expensive CFD solvers are often employed in single design point studies; however this approach is not practical for large design space exploration studies at a conceptual design level.…”
Section: Mass Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High fidelity studies concerning the aerodynamics of typical UCAV configurations have found complex flow topologies dominated by leading edge vortex interactions (Petterson, 2006;Tomac et al, 2010;Verhaagen, 2011). Computationally expensive CFD solvers are often used in single design point studies; however, this approach is not practical for large design space exploration studies at a conceptual design level.…”
Section: Aerodynamic Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower-fidelity methods have also been evaluated. These methods consist on potential flow solvers with compressibility and boundary-layer corrections (VSAERO, LIFTING_LINE), panel methods enhanced with leading-edge vortex separation and vortex breakdown models (Nangia-Aero-Panel, dwfs Panel), and vortex-lattice enhanced with empirical models (Tornado VLM, SHAMAN) (80,81) . Results show good agreement with lift and drag coefficients for low to moderate AoA; however, results for the pitching moment coefficient vary significantly due to non-linear flow phenomena that low-order methods cannot fully predict.…”
Section: Technology Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive use of this environment has been made and a broad list of publications are available demonstrating the capability of the environment. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] Desktop Aeronautics developed the program for aircraft synthesis studies (PASS). 36 It is suited for conventional subsonic layouts, but is also capable of analyzing supersonic business jets or oblique wings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%