2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-016-1079-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering microfluidic papers: determination of fibre source and paper sheet properties and their influence on capillary-driven fluid flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen in Figure 4(a), the pore size was higher in the case of lower basis weight sheets, indicating a more porous internal network, according with the density values (Figure 2 (c)) and also agreeing with the findings of Li et al and Carstens et al [8] [21] Moreover, the stronger the refining, the lower the pore size. This is also related with the higher flexibility of fibers reached during the refining process, enhancing the fiber bonding effect, which has been corroborated with the SEM images (Figure 3) [22].…”
Section: Pore Size Distribution Of Tested Paperssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As can be seen in Figure 4(a), the pore size was higher in the case of lower basis weight sheets, indicating a more porous internal network, according with the density values (Figure 2 (c)) and also agreeing with the findings of Li et al and Carstens et al [8] [21] Moreover, the stronger the refining, the lower the pore size. This is also related with the higher flexibility of fibers reached during the refining process, enhancing the fiber bonding effect, which has been corroborated with the SEM images (Figure 3) [22].…”
Section: Pore Size Distribution Of Tested Paperssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Those two proteins were printed separately on three different lab-engineered cellulose-papers, differing in their flow characteristics. According to Schabel and coworkers the fluid flow characteristics of lab-engineered paper were modulated by varying the effective specific energies while refining the cotton linters pulp as well as fractionating the fibers before paper sheet production 30 . This resulted in fabrication of papers with capillary flow rates of approximately 60 s/4 cm, 120 s/4 cm and 180 s/4 cm (named C60, C120, C180), representing suitable paper samples for the comparison with classical NC membranes (HiFlow75, HiFlow120, HiFlow180).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For hydration, fibres were stored in deionised water and allowed to swell for 45 minutes. As shown in (Carstens et al 2017;Hubbe et al 2013), the water progressed into the cotton linter test stripes in seconds. Furthermore, it was discovered that the free swelling time for a whole pulp was 70 minutes (Olejnik 2012).…”
Section: Fibresmentioning
confidence: 98%