2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.04.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering of protease variants exhibiting altered substrate specificity

Abstract: By using an improved genetic screening system, variants of the HAV 3CP protease which exhibit altered P2 specificity were obtained. We randomly mutated the His145, Lys146, Lys147, and Leu155 residues that constitute the S2 pocket of 3CP and then isolated variants that preferred substrates with Gln over the original Thr at the P2 position using a yeast-based screening method. One of the isolated variants cleaved the Gln-containing peptide substrate more efficiently in vitro, proving the efficiency of our method… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this might not be an issue for a well studied protease like TEVp whose substrate profile is well know, this can be an issue for less-characterized proteases. One way to determine the scissile bond is through mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of cleavage products from synthetic peptide substrates [32], [33]. However, we believe that our system also is amendable to MS-based identification of the exact cleavage site.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this might not be an issue for a well studied protease like TEVp whose substrate profile is well know, this can be an issue for less-characterized proteases. One way to determine the scissile bond is through mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of cleavage products from synthetic peptide substrates [32], [33]. However, we believe that our system also is amendable to MS-based identification of the exact cleavage site.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies from our laboratory and others have highlighted the importance of incorporating simultaneous counterselection substrates during the directed evolution of proteases to avoid isolating variants with relaxed specificity (14,20,36,37). Any number of counterselection substrate sequences can be added to the YESS substrate fusion construct to facilitate the engineering of narrow selectivity enzymes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engineered proteases displaying some degree of novel specificity have been developed in a few instances either via structure-guided mutagenesis or through directed evolution (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). In general, though, it has proved difficult to use rational design to generate highly active proteases with a desired new substrate selectivity, as mutations in one subsite typically disrupt the structure of neighboring subsites or of residues important for catalysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a prior study, we had engineered the S2 pocket of 3CP and generated a number of variants [16]. From this group, 12 variants were selected that contained mutations at amino acids 145, 146, 147, and 155.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These proteases show a unique substrate specificity preference for a glutamine residue at the P1 site. We have previously utilized a yeast-based screening method, referred to as the Genetic Assay for Site-specific Proteolysis (GASP), to produce an engineered variant of HAV 3CP that can cleave a peptide substrate containing glutamine at the P1′ site more efficiently than its original substrate [16]. Motivated by this earlier success, we further extended the use of GASP to generate a polyQ-specific protease (PQP) using directed evolution approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%