2022
DOI: 10.1002/admi.202200450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engineering the Morphology and Component via Multistep Deposition of CsPbBr3Films toward High Detectivity and Stable Self‐Powered Photodetectors

Abstract: Self‐powered perovskite photodetectors (PDs) have attracted tremendous interest for their promising advantages such as fast response speed and high detectivity. However, they usually suffer from severe operating instability issues stemming from the poor film quality, impurity phase formation, and numerous surface defects. Herein, the high performance and stable self‐powered PD based on CsPbBr3 film is demonstrated using a multistep spin‐coating method. The annealing temperature of lead bromide (PbBr2) films an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LDR of the device is 126.7 dB, indicating an excellent linear response over a wide irradiation range. In addition, the R and D* of the device are as high as 0.37 A/W and 1.1 × 10 13 jones, respectively (Figure 4f), surpassing most perovskite PDs, [17,30,[51][52][53][54] and the detailed comparison is shown in Table 1. Figure 4g shows the I-t curve of the device irradiated by laser with a pulse frequency of 6k Hz, revealing rise time (t rise , defined as from 10% to 90% of the saturation value) and decay time (t decay , defined as from 90% to 10% of the peak value) of 2.9 and 25.1 μs, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The LDR of the device is 126.7 dB, indicating an excellent linear response over a wide irradiation range. In addition, the R and D* of the device are as high as 0.37 A/W and 1.1 × 10 13 jones, respectively (Figure 4f), surpassing most perovskite PDs, [17,30,[51][52][53][54] and the detailed comparison is shown in Table 1. Figure 4g shows the I-t curve of the device irradiated by laser with a pulse frequency of 6k Hz, revealing rise time (t rise , defined as from 10% to 90% of the saturation value) and decay time (t decay , defined as from 90% to 10% of the peak value) of 2.9 and 25.1 μs, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…After 8 weeks in air storage, the photocurrent of the device was maintained at 93%. [22] In contrast, films prepared by the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method have high crystallinity and stability, as well as the ability to integrate with other materials and strong adhesion to most substrates. These features are beneficial for improving the performance of PDs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantum cascade detector (QCD), as a photovoltaic device, has made itself one of the prevalent devices in infrared detection. [1][2][3][4][5] Similar to self-powered photodetectors, [6][7][8] the QCD device could operate at zero bias, resulting in low dark current and high signal-to-noise ratio (S/N). [9,10] The difference is that the QCD is an intersubband (ISB) transition device and thus has a faster response time (≈1 ps), although at the cost of quantum efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%