2020
DOI: 10.1002/cae.22246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

English for specific purpose through facilitated and nonfacilitated MOOCs: An analysis of the learners' perspectives

Abstract: Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have gained attention from learners and teachers across the globe, but high dropout rate is a matter of concern, which makes it imperative to understand the reasons. From the theoretical perspective that learners learn more effectively through collaborative and socially cohesive communities, this qualitative study is focused to understand how learners experience facilitated and nonfacilitated MOOCs. It attempts to explore learners' perspectives from two different groups of l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of MOOCs in higher education has not only provided broader access to high-quality education but also allowed educators to integrate MOOCs into their teaching in new ways (Israel, 2015). By blending engaging teaching materials readily available from MOOCs with carefully designed in-class, faceto-face instruction, teachers of various subjects have started to experiment with different ways to enhance students' learning processes, such as using MOOCs in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) or English for Specific Purposes (ESP) courses (Beaven, 2013;Safdar et al, 2021), creating MOOC-based flipped learning for content courses (Wang & Zhu, 2019), and utilizing MOOCs for CLILbased teaching (Zubkov, 2022).…”
Section: Moocs and Corpus Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of MOOCs in higher education has not only provided broader access to high-quality education but also allowed educators to integrate MOOCs into their teaching in new ways (Israel, 2015). By blending engaging teaching materials readily available from MOOCs with carefully designed in-class, faceto-face instruction, teachers of various subjects have started to experiment with different ways to enhance students' learning processes, such as using MOOCs in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) or English for Specific Purposes (ESP) courses (Beaven, 2013;Safdar et al, 2021), creating MOOC-based flipped learning for content courses (Wang & Zhu, 2019), and utilizing MOOCs for CLILbased teaching (Zubkov, 2022).…”
Section: Moocs and Corpus Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be due to the expertise of the guest editorial team, but it is also true that MOOCs continue to receive a lot of attention in the Computer-Assisted Education research community, as Yousef and Summer [1] point out in this volume. Nevertheless, the use of MOOCs in the specific domain of Engineering Education was somewhat under-researched when the call was launched, which is reflected in this special issue with a number of relevant contributions such as Sahin's [14] analysis of optics software teaching tools, the studies on how learners interact in discussion forums [9,11], learners' behaviour and performance when watching online lecture videos [8], technologyenhanced interventions to increase engineering learners' engagement [2,12], including the best approaches to feedback for those with difficulties [16] and those whose English is not their first language [13].…”
Section: G U E S T E D I T O R I a Lmentioning
confidence: 99%