2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2003.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced ab initio protein folding simulations in Poisson–Boltzmann molecular dynamics with self-guiding forces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other notable studies include the implicit solvent simulations by Pak and coworkers (19), Scheraga and coworkers (20), and Herges and Wenzel (21). In addition, a variety of advanced techniques have been applied to facilitate the sampling of the native state (22)(23)(24). Nonetheless, the best C ␣ -rmsd sampled during those simulations was typically Ͼ3.0 Å, and the average C ␣ -rmsd of the most sampled conformations was significantly higher.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other notable studies include the implicit solvent simulations by Pak and coworkers (19), Scheraga and coworkers (20), and Herges and Wenzel (21). In addition, a variety of advanced techniques have been applied to facilitate the sampling of the native state (22)(23)(24). Nonetheless, the best C ␣ -rmsd sampled during those simulations was typically Ͼ3.0 Å, and the average C ␣ -rmsd of the most sampled conformations was significantly higher.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the self-guided molecular dynamics (SGMD) and self-guided Langevin dynamics (SGLD) were developed based on molecular dynamics or Langevin dynamics. they accelerate conformational search through enhancing low frequency motions of simulation systems (Wu and Wang 1998;Wu and Wang 1999;Wu and Brooks 2003;Wu and Brooks 2011a;Wu and Brooks 2011b) and has been applied in many simulation studies such as protein folding (Wu and Sung 1999;Wu and Wang 2000;Wu and Wang 2001;Wu, Wang et al 2002;Wen, Hsieh et al 2004;Wen and Luo 2004;Wu and Brooks 2004;Lee and Chang 2010;Lee and Olson 2010), ligand binding (Varady, Wu et al 2002), docking (Chandrasekaran, Lee et al 2009), conformational transition (Damjanovic, Miller et al 2008;Damjanovic, Wu et al 2008;Damjanovic, Garcia-Moreno E et al 2009;Pendse, Brooks et al 2010), and surface absorption (Abe and Jitsukawa 2009;Tsuru, Yosuke et al 2010). …”
Section: Other Sampling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This report does not cover the geometry optimization including equilibrium and transition structures, Henkelman et al 2000a;Olsen et al 2004;Schlegel 1982Schlegel , 2003Schlegel , 2011 conformational sampling, (Beusen 1996;Leach 1991;Parish 2002) or global minimum search methodologies, (Floudas & Pardalos 1996;Horst 1995Horst , 2000Torn 1989) which are all important for the studies of computational chemistry and biology. Other related topics, including enhanced sampling methods, (Earl & Deem 2005;Hamelberg et al 2004;Lei & Duan 2007;Okur et al 2006;Sugita 1999;Swendsen & Wang 1986;Thomas et al 2005;Wen et al 2004) simulation of nonequilibrium states, (Bair et al 2002;Cummings & Evans 1992;Hoover 1983;Hoover & Hoover 2005;Kjelstrup & Hafskjold 1996;Li et al 2008;Mundy et al 2000) and minimization methods, (Bonnans 2003;Dennis & Schnabel 1996;Fletcher 2000;Gill 1982;Haslinger & Mäkinen 2003;Nocedal 2006;Scales 1985) are not covered in this chapter either. The curious readers are welcome to read cited references for more information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%