2015
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2584310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Annuities: Drivers and Barriers of Supply and Demand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Benartzi et al. () examined the phenomenon of the annuity puzzle in their literature review in order to identify the factors that can explain its existence and develop policy proposals to stimulate annuity demand, while Gatzert and Klotzki () more specifically focus on factors that affect the demand for and supply of enhanced annuities based on a literature review and an empirical survey concerning the German market. Finally, Zietz () studied the literature on demand for life insurance in general.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Benartzi et al. () examined the phenomenon of the annuity puzzle in their literature review in order to identify the factors that can explain its existence and develop policy proposals to stimulate annuity demand, while Gatzert and Klotzki () more specifically focus on factors that affect the demand for and supply of enhanced annuities based on a literature review and an empirical survey concerning the German market. Finally, Zietz () studied the literature on demand for life insurance in general.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pricing variables added to traditional age/sex annuity pricing mirror the results from the crossover studies. Consistent with the frailty studies, enhanced annuity insurers include data on medical history and fatal diseases into pricing, with some insurers also offering enhanced benefits to smokers (Gatzert and Klotzki, 2015;Wuppermann, 2017). In addition to these variables, Brown and McDaid (2003) identify a broader list of potential enhanced annuity pricing variables, including participation in religious activities, years of education, and BMI, consistent with the crossover literature.…”
Section: Comparisons With Annuity Pricingmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…First, although personal annuities have traditionally been priced with minimal insurance under-writing, based only on the applicant's age and sex, the last decade has witnessed greater interest in developing more extensive risk classification systems for these products. Much of this interest is related to the development of enhanced (also known as substandard or medically underwritten) annuity products to impaired applicants who provide evidence to insurers about having health issues that often lead to an earlier death in the hopes of obtaining higher annuity payments while alive (Fong, 2015;Gatzert and Klotzki, 2015). In addition, some countries have considered the adoption of mandatory annuitization statutes to stabilize retirement income across retirees and reduce dependence on social insurance programs, with the United Kingdom (UK) mandating annuitization in the late 1990s through the mid-2010s.…”
Section: Applying Aristotelian Equality Standards To Annuity Pricingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Strictly speaking, the latter type of product is known as a life care annuity (Brown & Warshawsky, 2013), an enhanced annuity (Hoermann & Ruß, 2008;Brown & Scahill, 2010;Ramsay & Oguledo, 2020) or an embedded care annuity (Vidal-Melia et al, 2016). Recently, significant literature has grown around this topic (Gatzert & Klotzki, 2016;Eling & Ghavibazoo, 2019;Lambregts & Schut, 2019). The fundamental idea behind the life care annuity is based on the combination of longevity and disability risks in a single product (Alegre et al, 2002;Rickayzen, 2007;Levantesi & Menzietti, 2007;Levantesi & Menzietti, 2012), which often translates into shifting a part of the pension benefits into LTC benefits (Spillman et al, 2003;Wu et al, 2016;Vidal-Melia et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%