2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.11.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced biodiesel production from wet microalgae biomass optimized via response surface methodology and artificial neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this, the use of residual oils, the selection of inedible oilseed species with high oil yield, and the optimization of processes are fundamental studies [ 259 ]. Among the optimization techniques, the response surface methodology stands out due to its advantages, such as the determination of the independent variables’ magnitudes, the ability to model the system mathematically, as well as the time savings and cost reduction due to the smallest number of experiments necessary for the construction of the response surface [ 260 , 261 , 262 , 263 , 264 , 265 , 266 , 267 , 268 , 269 , 270 , 271 , 272 ].…”
Section: Discussion and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, the use of residual oils, the selection of inedible oilseed species with high oil yield, and the optimization of processes are fundamental studies [ 259 ]. Among the optimization techniques, the response surface methodology stands out due to its advantages, such as the determination of the independent variables’ magnitudes, the ability to model the system mathematically, as well as the time savings and cost reduction due to the smallest number of experiments necessary for the construction of the response surface [ 260 , 261 , 262 , 263 , 264 , 265 , 266 , 267 , 268 , 269 , 270 , 271 , 272 ].…”
Section: Discussion and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significance assessment of the model was based on the correlation coefficient R 2 and lack of fit value. [ 49,50 ] The ANOVA results of the model are presented in Table S8, where a large F ‐value ( F = 45.32) and a small p ‐value ( p < 0.0001) indicated the significance of the model. According to the pure error, the lack of fit ( p = 0.38) also suggested that the model fitted well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This statement is in agreement with other previous studies. 35,40 However, a slight decrease is observed between 480 and 540 min. These results imply that very high reaction times are not required to increase FAME yield because of factors such as solvent loss, overheating, energy expenditure, and FAME loss.…”
Section: Optimization Of the Fame Extraction And Analysis Of Thementioning
confidence: 96%
“…33,34 Muhammad et al and other studies reported a FAME yield increasing proportionally with acid catalyst dosage, but a slight depletion was also recorded at a concentration of 4000 mL per kg dry biomass. 35 Meanwhile, in another study, Duongbia et al showed this to have an advantage as to yield the best fatty acid; fatty acid production increased with the concentration rate of acid (1 M for 44.35%, over 3 M for 55.25%, and 4.5 M for 53.53% of fatty acid produced). 36 Considering the experimental results, 8 vol% DES dosage in methanol was adopted in the current experiment.…”
Section: Screening Of the Catalystmentioning
confidence: 99%