2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.112946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced burst strength of catechol groups-modified Alaska pollock-derived gelatin-based surgical adhesive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 72 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 33 ] The α CD/22C10‐ApGltn adhesive hydrogel degraded slow compared to Org‐ApGltn adhesive hydrogel because of its additional physical crosslinking due to the self‐assembly of decyl groups. Therefore, cell infiltration and enzymatic degradation by MMPs, [ 34 ] such as MMP‐2 and MMP‐9 [ 35,36 ] were delayed when α CD/22C10‐ApGltn adhesive hydrogel was implanted. On the other hand, the PEG adhesive hydrogel was mainly degraded by the hydrolysis of ester bonds in 4S‐PEG and showed a slower degradation rate than the Org‐ and α CD/22C10‐ApGltn adhesive hydrogels because there were no specific cleavage sites for the enzyme.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 33 ] The α CD/22C10‐ApGltn adhesive hydrogel degraded slow compared to Org‐ApGltn adhesive hydrogel because of its additional physical crosslinking due to the self‐assembly of decyl groups. Therefore, cell infiltration and enzymatic degradation by MMPs, [ 34 ] such as MMP‐2 and MMP‐9 [ 35,36 ] were delayed when α CD/22C10‐ApGltn adhesive hydrogel was implanted. On the other hand, the PEG adhesive hydrogel was mainly degraded by the hydrolysis of ester bonds in 4S‐PEG and showed a slower degradation rate than the Org‐ and α CD/22C10‐ApGltn adhesive hydrogels because there were no specific cleavage sites for the enzyme.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%