2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced electromechanical properties of piezoelectric thin flexible films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CB (N220, with an average particle diameter of 80 nm, supplied by CABOT Corporation) was chosen as the nanofiller, while PVDF (Kynar k721, with a density of 1.74 g/cm 3 and a melting point of ~158 ºC, supplied by ARKEMA) as the matrix, to fabricate a nanocomposite hybrid. The rudimental consideration of using CB as the nanofiller and PVDF as matrix lies in a twofold fact: (i) CB has a nano-scalar size and high specific surface area with PVDF, and it, compared with other nanofiller candidates such as CNTs, features much reduced amount of entanglement of nanoparticles [39][40][41], beneficial to the formation of an even, stable and uniform conductive network; (ii) PVDF, a thermoplastic material with higher elastic modulus, can present faster response to dynamic change than traditional rubber-based piezoresistive materials (rubber-based often exhibiting complex time-and frequencydependent viscoelastic properties, restricting them from being responsive to fast-change signals). Such a property of PVDF makes the hybrid highly responsive to dynamic elastic disturbance without marked hysteresis (to be demonstrated in sequent experiment).…”
Section: Materials Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CB (N220, with an average particle diameter of 80 nm, supplied by CABOT Corporation) was chosen as the nanofiller, while PVDF (Kynar k721, with a density of 1.74 g/cm 3 and a melting point of ~158 ºC, supplied by ARKEMA) as the matrix, to fabricate a nanocomposite hybrid. The rudimental consideration of using CB as the nanofiller and PVDF as matrix lies in a twofold fact: (i) CB has a nano-scalar size and high specific surface area with PVDF, and it, compared with other nanofiller candidates such as CNTs, features much reduced amount of entanglement of nanoparticles [39][40][41], beneficial to the formation of an even, stable and uniform conductive network; (ii) PVDF, a thermoplastic material with higher elastic modulus, can present faster response to dynamic change than traditional rubber-based piezoresistive materials (rubber-based often exhibiting complex time-and frequencydependent viscoelastic properties, restricting them from being responsive to fast-change signals). Such a property of PVDF makes the hybrid highly responsive to dynamic elastic disturbance without marked hysteresis (to be demonstrated in sequent experiment).…”
Section: Materials Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies still focus on lead zirconate titanate (PZT) ceramic as a filler for composite piezoelectric materials [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], but more and more interest is being shown for lead-free ceramics, such as barium titanate (BTO) [17,22,23,[35][36][37][38][39] and potassium-sodium niobate (KNN) [35,[40][41][42][43][44][45], since the evaporation of lead oxide during PZT sintering might be harmful [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvement of piezoelectric properties in such composites is achieved by increasing the dielectric properties of the polymer matrix by adding conductive nanomaterials to the matrix. Increased dielectric properties allow one to achieve a higher degree of polarization of piezoelectric particles inside the matrix, and thus higher piezoelectric output [2,3,[5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%