A comparative study of using alkali metal alkylcarboxylates as electron injection materials for different electron transfer layers in OLEDs are carried out based on the next two directions. Firstly, by fixing the (CH 3 ) 3 CCOOanionic group and changing the alkali metal ions gradually, (CH 3 ) 3 CCOOLi, (CH 3 ) 3 CCOONa, (CH 3 ) 3 CCOOK, (CH 3 ) 3 CCOORb and (CH 3 ) 3 CCOOCs are used as electron injection materials in OLED.In multilayer 10-(benzo[d]thiazol-2-yl)-2,2,7,7-tetramethyl-2,3,6,7-tetrahydro-1H,5H,when tris(8-quinolino -lato)aluminium (Alq 3 ) is used as electron transport layer (ETL), the devices with these alkali metal pivalate complexes as EIL can all achieve high luminous efficiency up to 20 cd/A. However, when 2-methyl-9,10-di(naphthalen-2-yl)anthracene (m-ADN) is used as ETL, the electron injection property and device efficiency are determined by the activities of alkali metal, and only the devices with (CH 3 ) 3 CCOORb and (CH 3 ) 3 CCOOCs as EIL can achieve high efficiency. Secondly, by fixing the Cs + ion and changing alkyl group, (CH 3 ) 3 CCOOCs, (CH 3 ) 2 CHCOOCs, CH 3 CH 2 COOCs, CH 3 COOCs, Cs 2 CO 3 and CsF are used as electron injection materials. No matter Alq 3 orm-ADN is used as ETL, the devices with these organic cesium complexes as electron injection layer exhibit similar electron injection property even that changing the alkyl chain. However, for the devices with m-ADN as ETL, Cs 2 CO 3 or CsF as EIL, the stability of device in the air is poor, which leads to a much lower luminous efficiency.