2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.02.036
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced H2/CH4 and H2/CO2 separation by carbon molecular sieve membrane coated on titania modified alumina support: Effects of TiO2 intermediate layer preparation variables on interfacial adhesion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure , the thickness of CMSMs prepared from P84 polymer solutions with weight concentration (polymer/solvent) of 0.05, 0.08, 0.10, and 0.12 under optimized pyrolysis temperature (600°C) was ~0.27, 0.48, 0.59, and 1.0 μm, respectively, which implied that diluting the concentration of the polymer solution is conducive to reducing the thickness of CMSMs, and vice versa. Compared to the supported flat CMSMs with thickness ranging from 1.0 to 10 μm reported in other literatures, fabricating CMSMs with the thickness lower than 1.0 μm is still challenging, which is among few examples of 6FDA‐based polyimide derived CMSMs with thickness of 0.3 μm and poly (furfuryl alcohol) derived CMSMs with thickness of 0.322 μm …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure , the thickness of CMSMs prepared from P84 polymer solutions with weight concentration (polymer/solvent) of 0.05, 0.08, 0.10, and 0.12 under optimized pyrolysis temperature (600°C) was ~0.27, 0.48, 0.59, and 1.0 μm, respectively, which implied that diluting the concentration of the polymer solution is conducive to reducing the thickness of CMSMs, and vice versa. Compared to the supported flat CMSMs with thickness ranging from 1.0 to 10 μm reported in other literatures, fabricating CMSMs with the thickness lower than 1.0 μm is still challenging, which is among few examples of 6FDA‐based polyimide derived CMSMs with thickness of 0.3 μm and poly (furfuryl alcohol) derived CMSMs with thickness of 0.322 μm …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CMS membranes have been synthesized on inorganic substrates such as porous carbon disk, [9] macroporous graphite disk, [10] g-alumina, [11] a-alumina, [12] porous stainless, [13] TiO 2 ceramic, [14] and titania modified alumina supports [15] by coating. These methods still require fabrication of the support, which is relatively more complicated and costly than hollow fiber spinning considered here.Use of alow-cost support precursor polymer (for example P84) rather than using the costly high performance polymer (for example 6FDA: BPDA-DAM) alone as amonolith can minimize cost of the composite membrane (Supporting Information, Fig-ure S1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the better performance of CMSM for the O 2 /N 2 separation is observed with different polymeric precursors, the cellulose-based CMSMs present the most favorable balance between permeability and selectivity compared to phenolic resin [ 22 , 50 , 108 , 127 ], polyimide [ 22 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 ], PEI [ 56 , 132 , 133 ], Polyfurfuryl alcohol (PFA) [ 134 , 135 ] and Poly(p-phenylene oxide) (PPO) [ 111 , 136 , 137 ] precursors ( Figure 11 ). The polyimide-based CMSMs present higher permeability but their selectivity are lower and its precursor cost makes their membranes less competitive in the market [ 31 ].…”
Section: Principal Applications Of Cellulose-based Carbon Moleculamentioning
confidence: 99%