2013
DOI: 10.1038/embor.2013.58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced microRNA accumulation through stemloop‐adjacent introns

Abstract: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) originate from stemloop-forming precursor RNAs found in longer primary transcripts that often contain introns. We show that in plants, those introns, when located 3 0 of the stemloop, can promote mature miRNA accumulation, through a mechanism that likely operates at the level of miRNA processing or stability. Reversely, when miRNA production is reduced such as in dicer-like 1 mutants, splicing of introns that promote miRNA processing is considerably increased, pointing to a tight physical an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

3
58
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, Schwab and colleagues did not observe such a significant reduction of miRNA levels when the donor splice site of the MIR163 transgene was mutated. 42 As discussed in their paper, 2 different explanations are possible: 1) the mutations introduced into the donor splice sites abolished splicing but did not prevent inefficient U1snRNP binding, or 2) the difference between promoters used (CaMV35S vs. the native MIR163 promoter) may exert some effects on co-transcriptional splicing and dicing of the pri-miR163. The second hypothesis is supported by the experiments that we have reported in our recently published paper, in which we used the CaMV35S promoter for all MIR161 splice variants: we do not observe such dramatic effects of donor splice site mutations on the miR163 accumulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, Schwab and colleagues did not observe such a significant reduction of miRNA levels when the donor splice site of the MIR163 transgene was mutated. 42 As discussed in their paper, 2 different explanations are possible: 1) the mutations introduced into the donor splice sites abolished splicing but did not prevent inefficient U1snRNP binding, or 2) the difference between promoters used (CaMV35S vs. the native MIR163 promoter) may exert some effects on co-transcriptional splicing and dicing of the pri-miR163. The second hypothesis is supported by the experiments that we have reported in our recently published paper, in which we used the CaMV35S promoter for all MIR161 splice variants: we do not observe such dramatic effects of donor splice site mutations on the miR163 accumulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42,43 All of these genes contain at least one intron located 3′ to the miRNA stem-loop. In the case of transgenic Arabidopsis lines in which MIR163 gene construct without intron has been introduced into the genetic background of the mir163-2 null mutant, the level of mature miR163 was strongly reduced.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations