2013
DOI: 10.1039/c3ra23425h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced osteoblast functions of narrow interligand spaced Sr-HA nano-fibers/rods grown on microporous titania coatings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For ordered patterns, integrin ligands with a lateral spacing larger than 70 nm inhibited focal adhesion formation and cell spreading. 30 In the present work, the HA nanorods on the HT3h coating are quasi-upright oriented with a disordered pattern and an interrod spacing of 68.1 AE 7.1 nm. 25,52 Our previous studies of Sr-HA patterned coatings on Ti also depicted that the formation of focal adhesion was significantly enhanced on the o96 nm spaced nanorod patterned 3D topographies and more pronounced with decreasing interrod spacing, but inhibited on the 496 nm spaced nanorods compared to the nanogranulated 2D topography 32 and flat Ti.…”
Section: Adhesion and Proliferation Of Osteoblasts On The Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For ordered patterns, integrin ligands with a lateral spacing larger than 70 nm inhibited focal adhesion formation and cell spreading. 30 In the present work, the HA nanorods on the HT3h coating are quasi-upright oriented with a disordered pattern and an interrod spacing of 68.1 AE 7.1 nm. 25,52 Our previous studies of Sr-HA patterned coatings on Ti also depicted that the formation of focal adhesion was significantly enhanced on the o96 nm spaced nanorod patterned 3D topographies and more pronounced with decreasing interrod spacing, but inhibited on the 496 nm spaced nanorods compared to the nanogranulated 2D topography 32 and flat Ti.…”
Section: Adhesion and Proliferation Of Osteoblasts On The Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…21 The surface features of implanted materials, such as chemical composition and topography, are recognized as crucial factors in regulating cell behaviors and bone tissue response. [30][31][32] Recent studies also demonstrated that the 3D topography of material surfaces could separately influence the behavior of cells; however, conflicting results have been reported. However, as an analogous substance to sodium tantalate, sodium titanate was reported to reveal lower proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts than HA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 A series of interactions will occur between the implant surface and the physiological environment after implantation into the human body. [29][30][31][32] However, to our knowledge, it is rare to use Sr-substituted implants together with micro/nanotopography to investigate the bone formation and osseointegration in osteoporotic bones in current research, though there have been some previous studies of Sr-doped implants in vivo. The performance of artificial implants mainly depends upon the surface characteristics such as topography and composition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al [39] suggested that porous and micron-sized crystals on surface of implant materials are beneficial to enhance the osteoblast adhesion and growth. Recently, it was shown that the presence of small HA nanoplates on the surface of implant materials enhanced the tissue adhesion and cell formation [39,59,60]. The SEM images also illustrated that the surface of the coated samples had macro-and microcracks which is due to formation of thermal stress and high energy discharges during the oxidation process (Fig 3A-B).…”
Section: Surface Morphology and Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 83%