2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced performance of p-i-n perovskite solar cell via defect passivation of nickel oxide/perovskite interface with self-assembled monolayer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NiO X has demonstrated its capabilities as a high‐performance HTL material in inverted PSCs, notably achieving over 86% FF in a recent report from Cao et al [ 27 ] However, NiO X PSCs consistently report lower open‐circuit voltages, compared with n–i–p PSCs fabricated with spiro‐OMeTAD HTLs. For example, despite the remarkable FF described by Cao et al, [ 27 ] the PCE is only 22.1% because of a relatively low V oc of 1.12 V. Lee et al [ 28 ] presented a low‐temperature‐processable NiO X as a HTL for the PSC with the V oc of 1.08 V. Also, in the work presented by Mann et al [ 29 ] the V OC of PSC with the surface‐modified NiO X did not exceed 1.11 V. In addition, despite the successful performance of Cu‐doped NiO X as the HTL layer compared with the undoped NiO X in enhancing the FF and J SC in an inverted PSC, the V oc could not go beyond 1.12 V. [ 30 ] In the triple‐cation PSC, Jin et al [ 31 ] applied NiO X as a HTL and reported 1.12 V V OC , while Yang et al [ 32 ] reported the V OC of 1.21 V using spiro‐OMeTAD as HTL. Recently, a record V OC of 1.16 V with 19.53% efficiency has been reported for an inverted PSC with NiO X HTL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NiO X has demonstrated its capabilities as a high‐performance HTL material in inverted PSCs, notably achieving over 86% FF in a recent report from Cao et al [ 27 ] However, NiO X PSCs consistently report lower open‐circuit voltages, compared with n–i–p PSCs fabricated with spiro‐OMeTAD HTLs. For example, despite the remarkable FF described by Cao et al, [ 27 ] the PCE is only 22.1% because of a relatively low V oc of 1.12 V. Lee et al [ 28 ] presented a low‐temperature‐processable NiO X as a HTL for the PSC with the V oc of 1.08 V. Also, in the work presented by Mann et al [ 29 ] the V OC of PSC with the surface‐modified NiO X did not exceed 1.11 V. In addition, despite the successful performance of Cu‐doped NiO X as the HTL layer compared with the undoped NiO X in enhancing the FF and J SC in an inverted PSC, the V oc could not go beyond 1.12 V. [ 30 ] In the triple‐cation PSC, Jin et al [ 31 ] applied NiO X as a HTL and reported 1.12 V V OC , while Yang et al [ 32 ] reported the V OC of 1.21 V using spiro‐OMeTAD as HTL. Recently, a record V OC of 1.16 V with 19.53% efficiency has been reported for an inverted PSC with NiO X HTL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 29 31 This motivates research to improve the NiO/perovskite interface, for example by using SAMs for surface passivation. 32 36 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…† Compared with pristine NiO x , the N 1s peak around 400 eV in the NiO x + glycine sample can be clearly observed, which belonging to the –NH 2 group. 31 Fig. 1c and d shows XPS spectra of Ni 2p 3/2 core level for the pristine NiO x film and the NiO x + glycine film.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carboxyl group can be anchored with the exposed hydroxy group on the NiO x surface, 28 and carboxyl group is a typical electron withdrawing group 29 can increasing the work function of NiO x . It's noteworthy that although various organic molecules [30][31][32][33] have been used to modify NiO x HTL in PSCs, there have been very few attempts to use amphoteric molecules in all-vacuum deposited PSCs. By optimizing the chemisorption time, we fabricated planar PSCs with NiO x /glycine/perovskite/ETL/Ag inverted structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%