2021
DOI: 10.1097/ana.0000000000000764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for Patients Undergoing Craniotomy: A Systematic Review

Abstract: I.K.: helped in screening the studies, data extraction, data analysis, and manuscript preparation. C.M.: helped in screening the studies, data extraction, and manuscript preparation. H.P.: helped in data analysis, prepared initial study design, and revised the final draft of the manuscript.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ERAS protocol has been introduced for patients with brain tumors, but there is no generally accepted standard protocol or guideline. 20 , 36 This is partly due to the limited data; therefore, further clinical studies are needed. Furthermore, studies on the importance of adherence to protocols have not yet been reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ERAS protocol has been introduced for patients with brain tumors, but there is no generally accepted standard protocol or guideline. 20 , 36 This is partly due to the limited data; therefore, further clinical studies are needed. Furthermore, studies on the importance of adherence to protocols have not yet been reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…86 At present, studies investigating ERAS protocols in cranial surgery remain scarce and only three RCTs could be included in two recent systematic reviews. 87,88 These studies demonstrate the feasibility of enhanced recovery after brain surgery, but the benefits need to be clarified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent systematic review identified 17 complete ERAS protocols published for elective craniotomy, demonstrating positive results in different outcomes such as postoperative pain control, reduced length of stay and costs 86 . At present, studies investigating ERAS protocols in cranial surgery remain scarce and only three RCTs could be included in two recent systematic reviews 87,88 . These studies demonstrate the feasibility of enhanced recovery after brain surgery, but the benefits need to be clarified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Opioids prescribed for postcraniotomy pain management are associated with intrinsic side effects and may affect neurological assessments by obscuring early signs of intracranial complications. 5 Strategies that rely on nonopioid analgesics are warranted, especially in the era of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), 6 which has been associated with benefits in postoperative pain management, length of hospital stay, and cost reduction in patients undergoing craniotomy. [6][7][8] Scalp nerve block (SNB) and scalp infiltration (SI) are unique alternatives to opioid analgesics in craniotomy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Strategies that rely on nonopioid analgesics are warranted, especially in the era of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), 6 which has been associated with benefits in postoperative pain management, length of hospital stay, and cost reduction in patients undergoing craniotomy. [6][7][8] Scalp nerve block (SNB) and scalp infiltration (SI) are unique alternatives to opioid analgesics in craniotomy. SNB, initially described by Girvin, 9 involves blocking the superficial sensory nerves of the scalp at multiple sites, whereas SI involves subcutaneous infiltration of local anesthetics at the surgical incision site.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%