2007
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced relative BOLD signal changes in T2‐weighted stimulated echoes

Abstract: The origin of the stimulus/task-induced signal changes in spin echo (SE) functional MRI (fMRI) at high magnetic fields is dynamic averaging due to diffusion in the presence of field gradients surrounding deoxyhemoglobin-containing microvasculature. The same mechanism is expected to be operative in stimulated echoes (STE). Compared to SE-fMRI, however, STEfMRI has the potential for larger diffusion weighting and consequently larger stimulus/task-induced signal changes as a result of an additional delay, the mix… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the functional contrast in 3D GRASE images consists of both T 2 and stimulated echo weightings. It has been shown with modeling that the contrast generated by stimulated echoes originates from dynamic averaging due to diffusion and is thus similar to conventional SE-EPI with the potential advantage of higher signal changes due to longer sampling periods [39]. However, whether or not 3D GRASE provides any specificity advantages over conventional GE for high resolution applications of cortical layers or columns, as has been shown for conventional SE BOLD imaging at high fields, has not yet been established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the functional contrast in 3D GRASE images consists of both T 2 and stimulated echo weightings. It has been shown with modeling that the contrast generated by stimulated echoes originates from dynamic averaging due to diffusion and is thus similar to conventional SE-EPI with the potential advantage of higher signal changes due to longer sampling periods [39]. However, whether or not 3D GRASE provides any specificity advantages over conventional GE for high resolution applications of cortical layers or columns, as has been shown for conventional SE BOLD imaging at high fields, has not yet been established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using 3D GRASE imaging [37], [38] with a train of refocused pulses to encode a 3D slab combined with inner volume excitation, facilitates the efficient acquisition of high isotropic resolution images with higher SNR over extended volumes compared to inner volume based 2D SE-EPI, which has produced high resolution fMRI maps in humans. The resulting 3D images, however, do have stimulated-echo weighted contrast [39] in addition to T 2 weighting. Despite this, we were able to successfully map axis of motion columns in human area MT [10], demonstrating the high degree of spatial specificity achievable with 3D GRASE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The later (non-center) partitions in the 3D-GRASE echo-train are sampled at a later effective TE than the nominal TE, which was matched with the TE of 2D SE-EPI 1. Therefore, the T 2 contribution is higher in 3D-GRASE because later partitions experience more T 2 weighting and additional T 2 weighted stimulated echo weighting than the center partition (Goerke et al, 2007 ). In addition, blood vessels have a particularly sharp spatial profile (compared to smoother gray or white matter structures), which manifests itself in the k-space regions corresponding to high spatial frequencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the use of T 2 -weighted fMRI is desirable for the sake of a higher spatial specificity of BOLD activation. Owing to its high sensitivity, ready availability and (in relation to pure spin echo sequences) low radiofrequency power deposition SE-EPI is the most promising candidate sequence, but several alternatives have also been tested [FSE (Constable et al, 1994), RASER (Chamberlain et al, 2007), nb-S2-SSFP (Barth et al, 2010), HASTE (Poser and Norris, 2007), STE (Goerke et al, 2007), bSSFP (Miller et al, 2003;Scheffler et al, 2001)]. Unfortunately, the application of a sufficiently fast, whole brain SE-EPI protocol faces several practical limitations that have impeded the common use of T 2 -weighting for fMRI:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%