2012
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2012.2182785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Road Boundary and Obstacle Detection Using a Downward-Looking LIDAR Sensor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…4,5,[15][16][17][18][19] To our best of our knowledge, conventional lidar-radar fusion has been mainly focused on detecting moving vehicles, and researches on pedestrian detection have not been investigated yet before. In previous methods, a vehicle is estimated by obtaining its width, length, and shape from lidar and then acquiring its velocity from radar.…”
Section: Lidar-radar Sensor Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5,[15][16][17][18][19] To our best of our knowledge, conventional lidar-radar fusion has been mainly focused on detecting moving vehicles, and researches on pedestrian detection have not been investigated yet before. In previous methods, a vehicle is estimated by obtaining its width, length, and shape from lidar and then acquiring its velocity from radar.…”
Section: Lidar-radar Sensor Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ALS data analysis is time consuming and computer-intensive, depending on the data volume, which in return slows the modeling process in the chain from point to tangible data ready for use in GIS software or similar environments. Many of the approaches concentrate on domain specific solutions which range from DTM creation [9][10][11][12] and geomorphic features detection [2,13,14] to the automatic extraction of buildings [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], roads [24][25][26][27], and tree reconstruction/tree classification [6,7,[28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Problem Definition and Added Value Of This Review Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref. [17], IEPF algorithm is used to identify road features on a high-speed unmanned vehicle which won the championship thereby. We process LADAR data in three steps: The first step is breakpoint detection; the second step is line extraction; the third step is security transformation.…”
Section: Ladar Data Processing For Viability Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5(b) shows data processing for convex obstacle. The data processing is similar with the traditional IEPF algorithm, see [17]. The algorithm splits scan points P = {p ns , · · · , p n , · · · , p ne } between two continuous breakpoints p ns , p ne into two subsets P = {p ns , · · · , p n } and P " = {p n , · · · , p ns }, when the maximum distance l max from scan points p n in the set P to the line p ns p ne is greater than the threshold l * Th .…”
Section: Line Segment Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%