2002
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01395.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Selection for MHC Diversity in Social Tuco-Tucos

Abstract: Abstract. To explore the effects of behavior and demography on balancing selection at major histocompatibility complex (MHC) loci, we examined allelic diversity at exon 2 of the MHC class II DQ␤ locus in a social and a solitary species of tuco-tuco (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae: Ctenomys), both of which occur in the same valley in southwestern Argentina. By comparing patterns of diversity at this MHC gene to the diversity evident at fifteen microsatellite loci, we demonstrate that balancing selection at the DQ␤ locus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Watterson (1978) proposed that deviation from such an equilibrium is an indicator of departures from neutrality and hence selection. The so-called Ewens-Watterson test of neutrality has been used to confirm the effects of balancing selection acting on the MHC in both non-model species (Paterson, 1998;Miller et al, 2001;Hambuch and Lacey, 2002) and humans (Mack et al, 2000;Begovich et al, 2001).…”
Section: Detecting Selection In Contemporary Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Watterson (1978) proposed that deviation from such an equilibrium is an indicator of departures from neutrality and hence selection. The so-called Ewens-Watterson test of neutrality has been used to confirm the effects of balancing selection acting on the MHC in both non-model species (Paterson, 1998;Miller et al, 2001;Hambuch and Lacey, 2002) and humans (Mack et al, 2000;Begovich et al, 2001).…”
Section: Detecting Selection In Contemporary Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding how social structure affects MHC dynamics may be especially important given that social structure will influence the transmission of parasites and disease at a local scale, and also the potential for mate choice decisions will vary in response to levels of local inbreeding. Such processes do appear to be pertinent - Hambuch and Lacey (2002) compared the strength of balancing selection between a social and a solitary species of tuco-tuco (Ctenomys sociabilis and C. haigi, respectively), testing the hypothesis that sociality affects parasite transmission that will influence selection. Selection coefficients were more than 50 times greater in the social species.…”
Section: Summary and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PBRs, for example, are commonly deduced by comparing MHC sequences from a species of interest with human counterparts (e.g. Grimholt et al 1993;Kim et al 1999;Hoelzel et al 1999;Hambuch and Lacey 2002), where the crystal structure has been analysed (Brown et al 1993). Often, patterns of selection on MHC genes are then studied with respect to PBRs/non-PBRs identified in this manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among-population differentiation at MHC loci has been observed to range from lower than (Sommer, 2003;Aguilar et al, 2004), similar to (Boyce et al, 1997;Parker et al, 1999;Hedrick et al, 2001;Huang and Yu, 2003), to higher than that at neutral loci (Miller et al, 2001;Beacham et al, 2004), reflecting differences in the relative strengths of natural selection, genetic drift and gene flow across species (Eizaguirre et al, 2010). Indeed, the relative levels of neutral and MHC variation within and among populations can vary across closely related species (Hambuch and Lacey, 2002;Jarvi et al, 2004), and even within a species depending on the spatial scale of analysis . In comparison to studies of geographic patterns in MHC variation, there have been relatively few studies on MHC which also include a temporal dimension, despite the possibility that selective forces across time within a population may differ from those across populations (Smulders et al, 2003;Sommer, 2003;Beacham et al, 2004;Seddon and Ellegren, 2004;Westerdahl et al, 2004;Coughlan et al, 2006;Oliver et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%