2020
DOI: 10.1063/5.0018785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced single-cell encapsulation in microfluidic devices: From droplet generation to single-cell analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 191 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We encourage readers to refer to other reviews regarding microfluidic-based droplet generation and single-cell encapsulation for more extensive detail. [155,[157][158][159][160][161]…”
Section: Leveraging Microfluidics For Optimizing Monodispersity and Capture Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We encourage readers to refer to other reviews regarding microfluidic-based droplet generation and single-cell encapsulation for more extensive detail. [155,[157][158][159][160][161]…”
Section: Leveraging Microfluidics For Optimizing Monodispersity and Capture Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, manual washing steps via centrifugation are slow and can expose cells to extended periods of stress, while on-chip isolation methods provide a faster and facile way of retrieving single-cell microgels from the continuous phase. [161] There are many dimensionless parameters that physically describe microfluidic-based droplet generation (e.g., Reynolds number, Weber number, and Bond number), but for simplicity we focus primarily on the capillary number (Ca). The capillary number is the ratio of viscous force to interfacial tension, Ca = μU/γ, where μ is the fluid dynamic viscosity, U is the fluid velocity, and γ is the interfacial tension between the two fluids.…”
Section: Microfluidic-based Droplet Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This reduces the problem to a single Poisson statistic allowing the majority of cells to be captured, albeit necessitating lower droplet generation rates, ultimately producing equivalent throughput to solid bead systems. The general problem of single cell encapsulation has attracted great interest, resulting in a wide variety of passive (trapping, 12,13 deterministic 14 and inertial ordering [15][16][17] ) and active (electrical, [18][19][20] magnetic, 21 optical, 22 acoustic 23 and mechanical 24 ) droplet generation and encapsulation strategies that have recently been expertly reviewed by Ling et al 25 Passive approaches harness flow and channel properties, with the benefit of being easy to operate. In particular, inertial microfluidic formats [26][27][28] enable high throughput and can produce entrainment effects to offer the enticing possibility of the periodic delivery of cell and beads, allowing deterministic packaging into droplets to free assays from the limitations of the Poisson statistic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Droplet microfluidics has recently emerged as a powerful technology for single-cell manipulation [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Aqueous droplets in oil provide small isolated volumes, engineered environments, controllable vessels, and reduced shear stress levels on the encapsulated cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%