2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2006.06.393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Sodium Extraction with Ultrafiltration Compared to Intravenous Diuretics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, the ability to precisely control the removal of sodium and water allows the ultrafiltrate extracted from serum during UF therapy to be isotonic and isonatric. As such, UF results in a more effective reduction in total body sodium content when compared to an equal volume of fluid removed from the body by diuretic therapy [21,22] . Moreover, because solutes are free to cross the semipermeable membrane, large volumes of fluids can be removed without adversely affecting the concentration of solutes or serum electrolytes.…”
Section: Uf Versus Diuretic Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Likewise, the ability to precisely control the removal of sodium and water allows the ultrafiltrate extracted from serum during UF therapy to be isotonic and isonatric. As such, UF results in a more effective reduction in total body sodium content when compared to an equal volume of fluid removed from the body by diuretic therapy [21,22] . Moreover, because solutes are free to cross the semipermeable membrane, large volumes of fluids can be removed without adversely affecting the concentration of solutes or serum electrolytes.…”
Section: Uf Versus Diuretic Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, because solutes are free to cross the semipermeable membrane, large volumes of fluids can be removed without adversely affecting the concentration of solutes or serum electrolytes. In contrast, diuretic therapy is associ-ated with potassium and magnesium loss; electrolyte abnormalities may predispose an already dysfunctional myocardium to malignant arrhythmias [22] .…”
Section: Uf Versus Diuretic Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UF, however, is the gold standard for sodium removal since the fluid removed is isotonic. 4,25,26,39,59 Therefore, even if patients experience similar degrees of fluid removal, total body sodium extraction is greater following UF compared to loop diuretics. Recent experience treating HF patients with vasopressin antagonists provides an opportunity to evaluate the effect of hypotonic volume removal since vasopressin antagonists result in the elimination of free water with very little sodium.…”
Section: -53mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Our group recently demonstrated that diuretics cannot accomplish the same task as ultrafiltration because the sodium concentration in urine is invariably lower than that in serum and in the ultrafiltrate. 17 Given the more effective volume extraction achieved with ultrafiltration compared with diuretic therapy, the differential sodium extraction with ultrafiltration vs diuretics greatly enhances the total quantity of excessive sodium extracted. 12,14 Thereby, the dual objective of adequate decongestion and adequate sodium extraction is realized.…”
Section: Efficacy and Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%