2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80725-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Visualization Processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects on sensitivity and specificity of nodule detection were quite limited, but improvements were found in detection confidence, a subjective criterion reflecting how confident a reader feels about a diagnostic decision. This is consistent with other reports on improved diagnostic satisfaction with increased latitude image postprocessing [3,35]. Image reading and diagnostic decisions are facilitated, although this alone does not guarantee improved diagnostic accuracy.…”
Section: Clinical Relevancesupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effects on sensitivity and specificity of nodule detection were quite limited, but improvements were found in detection confidence, a subjective criterion reflecting how confident a reader feels about a diagnostic decision. This is consistent with other reports on improved diagnostic satisfaction with increased latitude image postprocessing [3,35]. Image reading and diagnostic decisions are facilitated, although this alone does not guarantee improved diagnostic accuracy.…”
Section: Clinical Relevancesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In clinical practice, image processing methods with automatic tone scale rendering and latitude and contrast enhancement are rather welcome for producing display ready hardcopies or minimizing the time required for image manipulation during softcopy reading [3,13,18,[32][33][34]. These effects on clinical work flow were documented recently [35]. For this purpose, increased latitude post-processing will be applied at fixed levels between 1.5 and 2.0 before the images are saved for viewing or hardcopy printing.…”
Section: Clinical Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6] These processing protocols have been perfected and customized for speci®c examination types (eg, chest versus rib versus hip); however, as Andriole et al 7 point out, the preferred type of postprocessing manipulation diers depending on the varying disease processes and anatomic regions of interest. Based on these factors, we determined that several image manipulations, performed in sequence, should be used to optimize diagnostic accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E.A. Krupinski has written extensively on the topic of image perception as it is affected and enhanced by digital image acquisition and associated computer driven softcopy displays [16][17][18] . Her research into the topic has emphasized the need for perceptually based standards for image quality based on quantifiable data that define the optimal presentation parameters (e.g., size, luminance levels, and spatial and contrast resolution).…”
Section: Image Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%