2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.96.113002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancement and Quenching of Single-Molecule Fluorescence

Abstract: We present an experimental and theoretical study of the fluorescence rate of a single molecule as a function of its distance to a laser-irradiated gold nanoparticle. The local field enhancement leads to an increased excitation rate whereas nonradiative energy transfer to the particle leads to a decrease of the quantum yield (quenching). Because of these competing effects, previous experiments showed either fluorescence enhancement or fluorescence quenching. By varying the distance between molecule and particle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

95
2,983
6
25

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,882 publications
(3,191 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
95
2,983
6
25
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed above, by linking the dyes to the AuNRs surface with the biotin/streptavidin conjugation, they are kept at an average distance of 5 nm from the metal, thus, avoiding the quenching of the plasmonicfluorescent nanoprobes. 30,31 At this distance, the still-appreciable field enhancement produced by the AuNR (see Figure 2 To demonstrate the potential of the AuNRs for NP-STED, we functionalized a glass cover-slip to attach the AuNRs to the surface (see Methods for further details) and compared the resolution improvement relative to confocal microscopy for the AuNR and for 20 nm diameter crimson red beads as a function of the power of the depletion-beam. Assuming that the depletion beam pulse length, , is much smaller than the fluorescence lifetime of the fluorophore, 1 , the resolution achievable with pulsed STED depends on the wavelength, λ, the numerical aperture (NA) of the objective, the peak intensity of the depletion beam, , and the saturation intensity of the fluorophore, , as given by: 16,32 Hence, we can write the STED resolution improvement with respect to confocal microscopy as Γ = √1 + ∅.…”
Section: Green (Blue) Line Is the Absorption (Emission) Spectrum Of Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed above, by linking the dyes to the AuNRs surface with the biotin/streptavidin conjugation, they are kept at an average distance of 5 nm from the metal, thus, avoiding the quenching of the plasmonicfluorescent nanoprobes. 30,31 At this distance, the still-appreciable field enhancement produced by the AuNR (see Figure 2 To demonstrate the potential of the AuNRs for NP-STED, we functionalized a glass cover-slip to attach the AuNRs to the surface (see Methods for further details) and compared the resolution improvement relative to confocal microscopy for the AuNR and for 20 nm diameter crimson red beads as a function of the power of the depletion-beam. Assuming that the depletion beam pulse length, , is much smaller than the fluorescence lifetime of the fluorophore, 1 , the resolution achievable with pulsed STED depends on the wavelength, λ, the numerical aperture (NA) of the objective, the peak intensity of the depletion beam, , and the saturation intensity of the fluorophore, , as given by: 16,32 Hence, we can write the STED resolution improvement with respect to confocal microscopy as Γ = √1 + ∅.…”
Section: Green (Blue) Line Is the Absorption (Emission) Spectrum Of Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 The near-field of the plasmonic structure can modify the emission of a fluorophore. [7][8][9][10][11][12] Depending on the plasmonic properties of the metallic nanoparticle (MNP) it can lead to quenching or enhancement of the fluorophore emission. The modified emission can be a consequence of many processes such as NRET to the MNP, scattering and absorption by the MNP, and changes in the emitter's radiative and nonradiative decay rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12, 13 Fluorescence enhancement by plasmonic nanoparticles has been studied extensively over the past few decades. Early reports by the groups of Sandoghdar 14 and Novotny 15 employed a single gold nanosphere of 80 nm in diameter and achieved a fluorescence enhancement of a factor of 9. The fluorescence enhancement near gold nanospheres is modest because of the relatively small field enhancement (∼5 times).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%