1980
DOI: 10.1016/0363-8235(80)90001-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancement of cerebral infarcts with CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
3
2

Year Published

1980
1980
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We suggest that the value of the outcome of autopsy studies should be reconsidered in deciding whether stroke patients, in whom anticoagulant treatment is indicated, should receive such therapy or not. The present data and earlier studies (13,14,15,16,17,18,19) suggest that CT findings are far more relevant in this respect, and these show HI in only a small number of patients. However, since it is not excluded that anticoagulant treatment turns an HI into a frank hematoma, we suggest that patients with HI on CT should not receive such treatment as long as HI is present.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We suggest that the value of the outcome of autopsy studies should be reconsidered in deciding whether stroke patients, in whom anticoagulant treatment is indicated, should receive such therapy or not. The present data and earlier studies (13,14,15,16,17,18,19) suggest that CT findings are far more relevant in this respect, and these show HI in only a small number of patients. However, since it is not excluded that anticoagulant treatment turns an HI into a frank hematoma, we suggest that patients with HI on CT should not receive such treatment as long as HI is present.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Patients without SM and HI have a better prognosis and will consequently not be considered in autopsy series. Therefore, pathologic studies are probably biased in finding a high number of HI, especially in embolic stroke, and they do not reflect the prevalence of HI during life, which is much lower as indicated by the present data and other studies (13,14,15,16,17,18,19). Our data also show that the number of patients with cardiac embolic stroke in the HI group did not differ from the control group indicating that cardiac embolism cannot be inferred from the presence of HI on CT as we showed before (18).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…[20][21][22][23] This contrasts with the findings in pathology series in which in about two thirds of the cases with embolic stroke HI was found. 6 ' 7 This could be explained by a possible bias in pathology series, especially when death is primarily caused by structural brain impairment in cases with brain herniation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…[8][9][10] Therefore, some clinicians feared aggravation of the neurological deficit by inducing hemorrhage into ischemic brain areas in patients with embolic stroke, 3 " -17 although the few available clinical studies lent no support to this view. 18,19 Since hemorrhagic infarction is seldom seen on CT [20][21][22] even in cases with embolic stroke, 23 we assumed that clinical findings differ from the outcome of pathology and experimental studies. Therefore we prospectively studied the risk of early anticoagulant treatment (started within 24 hours after the embolic stroke) during the early phase (three weeks) in patients with an embolic stroke.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23] It is rarely seen within the first week but may be observed in 60 to 70% of patients by 2 to 4 weeks after the acute event. 23,24 It is also seen more commonly with larger infarcts and infarcts with mass effect, possibly accounting for the observed poor prognosis of enhancing lesions. 22 Possibly patients with stroke and no ischemic lesions on CT are a favorable selection for early surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%