2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.04.107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancement of n-butanol production by in situ butanol removal using permeating–heating–gas stripping in acetone–butanol–ethanol fermentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
28
2
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
28
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the concentration of the product in the condensate was stable as it is illustrated in Fig 5b, which indicated that the fluctuant of the ABE in the bioreactor was correlated with gas stripping. Though the solvents concentration were wildly changed during one period of gas stripping, however, averagely, the ABE concentration always remained stable and resulted in the stable output of the production in the condensate (about 45-55 g/L of acetone, 140-175 g/L of butanol, 20-30 g/L of ethanol), which was similar with the phenomenon of previous studies [20,30]. Therefore, concentration of butanol exceed $8% (w/v), the critical concentration of water-oil phase separation, which would significantly simplify the butanol purification process and reduce the energy cost to produce anhydrous butanol product [27,29,30].…”
Section: Fed-batch Fermentation Integrated With Intermitted Gas Stripsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the concentration of the product in the condensate was stable as it is illustrated in Fig 5b, which indicated that the fluctuant of the ABE in the bioreactor was correlated with gas stripping. Though the solvents concentration were wildly changed during one period of gas stripping, however, averagely, the ABE concentration always remained stable and resulted in the stable output of the production in the condensate (about 45-55 g/L of acetone, 140-175 g/L of butanol, 20-30 g/L of ethanol), which was similar with the phenomenon of previous studies [20,30]. Therefore, concentration of butanol exceed $8% (w/v), the critical concentration of water-oil phase separation, which would significantly simplify the butanol purification process and reduce the energy cost to produce anhydrous butanol product [27,29,30].…”
Section: Fed-batch Fermentation Integrated With Intermitted Gas Stripsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Besides, what particularly intrigued was that the fermentation period gradually shorted with time during the operation. This phenomenon was contrary to the results of other reports in the case of fed-batch fermentation-gas stripping integration [20,29,30]. It might be caused by the facilitation of the simplified process in the current work.…”
Section: Fed-batch Fermentation With Continuous Gas Strippingcontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A major focus of the hybrid separation processes has been improving the efficiency of gas stripping. This has included investigations into multi‐stage gas stripping processes, increasing the temperature at which gas stripping is performed and hybrid gas‐stripping pervaporation processes, with the aim of reducing the energy requirements for further separation of the condensate. Oudshoorn et al .…”
Section: In Situ Product Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…estimated the selectivity of gas stripping for butanol to be 4–22, which is low compared to distillation with an estimated selectivity of 72, thereby the recovered solution is not very concentrated. It has been widely noted that to achieve significant decreases in the energy for downstream purification, two‐phase separation needs to be observed in the recovered ABE solution . To achieve this phase separation, it has been suggested that the butanol concentration in the fermenter should be greater than 8 g/L, but concentrations this high start to impact on the fermentation performance …”
Section: In Situ Product Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%