2020
DOI: 10.3390/ma13184172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancement of the Load Capacity of High-Energy Laser Monocrystalline Silicon Reflector Based on the Selection of Surface Lattice Defects

Abstract: Various defects during the manufacture of a high-energy laser monocrystalline silicon reflector will increase the energy absorption rate of the substrate and worsen the optical properties. Micron-scale or larger manufacturing defects have been inhibited by mechanism study and improvement in technology, but the substrate performance still fails to satisfy the application demand. We focus on the changes in the optical properties affected by nanoscale and Angstrom lattice defects on the surface of monocrystalline… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Owing to its excellent mid-to short-spatial-period error control with a root-meansquare (RMS) roughness value in the subnanometer level [1], chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) has been applied for monocrystalline silicon mirror fabrication in the aerospace industry and high energy beam system domains [2][3][4][5]. Microscale surface morphology is a direct source for silicon mirror evaluations of mid-to short-spatial-period errors during CMP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to its excellent mid-to short-spatial-period error control with a root-meansquare (RMS) roughness value in the subnanometer level [1], chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) has been applied for monocrystalline silicon mirror fabrication in the aerospace industry and high energy beam system domains [2][3][4][5]. Microscale surface morphology is a direct source for silicon mirror evaluations of mid-to short-spatial-period errors during CMP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%