2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11257-019-09225-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing cultural recommendations through social and linked open data

Abstract: In this article, we describe a hybrid recommender system (RS) in the artistic and cultural heritage area, which takes into account the activities on social media performed by the target user and her friends, and takes advantage of linked open data (LOD) sources. Concretely, the proposed RS (1) extracts information from Facebook by analyzing content generated by users and their friends; (2) performs disambiguation tasks through LOD tools; (3) profiles the active user as a social graph; (4) provides her with per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Empowering cultural heritage professionals with tools for… individual visitor logs (Kuflik and Dim 2013), to determine visit fatigue (Bitgood 2010), or to dynamically compute which is the next visit step to recommend (see for example (Alexandridis et al 2019) and (Sansonetti et al 2019) for a review of different approaches). Personalisation rules could also embed advanced forms of cognition-based user modelling, as proposed by Raptis et al (2019).…”
Section: Controlling the Interactive Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empowering cultural heritage professionals with tools for… individual visitor logs (Kuflik and Dim 2013), to determine visit fatigue (Bitgood 2010), or to dynamically compute which is the next visit step to recommend (see for example (Alexandridis et al 2019) and (Sansonetti et al 2019) for a review of different approaches). Personalisation rules could also embed advanced forms of cognition-based user modelling, as proposed by Raptis et al (2019).…”
Section: Controlling the Interactive Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such factors reflect on various aspects that influence the visitor experience [58,59] such as intrinsic motivations [60], perceived quality of the CH experience [61], and emotional connection [62]. Personalization factors that can be used in combination with cognition are: visitor location [63], interests [64], social behavior [65], background knowledge [66], preferences [67], motivation [68], themes [69], mood [70], visiting style [71], visit and viewing time [72], visit history [73], and disabilities [74]. Therefore, we envisage an open collection of personalization factors that could be integrated in DeCACHe and could be used as complementary factors to cognition, aiming to provide the CH designers with an enriched toolset to help them make better design decisions when creating personalized CH activities.…”
Section: Combining Cognition With Other Personalization Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insofar, however, each cultural application is designed, implemented, and deployed separately, increasing the associated development costs (content development, code creation and testing, infrastructure deployment, and maintenance), while, at the same time, limiting the opportunities for sharing and reusing cultural experiences to the level of recommending isolated points of interests (PoIs) or coarse-grained routes [7][8][9]. The impact of these challenges is more pronounced in augmented, virtual, and mixed reality (AR/VR/MR) systems, for which content development, code implementation and deployment infrastructure are more complex and demanding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%