2018
DOI: 10.1080/09649069.2018.1519655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing judicial skills in domestic violence cases: the development, implementation, and preliminary evaluation of a model US programme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They report vicarious trauma and burnout and note that well-known methods for reducing vicarious trauma, such as debriefing, are not available to them due to the confidential nature of their work (Jaffe et al, 2003). Judicial training programs designed to educate judges about IPV have been well-received (Jaffe et al, 2018) and similar efforts to train and support judges may be key to enhancing responses to survivors.…”
Section: Prevention and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They report vicarious trauma and burnout and note that well-known methods for reducing vicarious trauma, such as debriefing, are not available to them due to the confidential nature of their work (Jaffe et al, 2003). Judicial training programs designed to educate judges about IPV have been well-received (Jaffe et al, 2018) and similar efforts to train and support judges may be key to enhancing responses to survivors.…”
Section: Prevention and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sports coaching programs in Indonesia evaluated using the Countenance Model have proven effective in achieving athlete coaching goals (Fielding & Turner, 2022). Articles regarding the evaluation of sports coaching programs provide positive subjective findings from the discussion in each article, such as levels of satisfaction, motivation, and perceptions of coaching (Jaffe et al, 2018). The Countenance model reveals additional information through analysis of participants' facial expressions and emotions, providing deep insight into the level of emotional engagement during practice and competition (Urabe et al, 2021;Zamir & Zilka, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the research on judicial continuing education has focused on training participants’ satisfaction and changes in pre‐ to post‐training knowledge. Even though there have been substantial efforts to increase judicial continuing education in the past 30 years, very little research has evaluated change in judges behavior in relation to participation in continuing education (Armytage, 2015; Edwards, 2013; Jaffe et al, 2018), which poses a significant limitation to the position that increasing judicial education will result in changes in judicial knowledge, attitudes, and behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%