“…The lack of scientifically grounded classification of integral learning outcomes in higher education has caused terminological discordance. In some publications, along with established conceptual categories of "key competencies", "professional competence", "communicative competence", "foreign language communicative competence" (Bogush et al, 2019;Kachmarchyk et al, 2019;Мammadov et al, 2019) etc., arguable terms are adopted, which significantly complicate modern scientific discourse: "cross-curricular competencies" (Gewerc et al, 2011), "technical competency" (Bovermann et al, 2018;Sinchev et al, 2018), "intercultural competence" (Tomozeiu et al, 2016;Holubnycha et al, 2019;Casañ-Pitarch et al, 2020), "traditional teaching competencies", "original teacher competency", "traditional competencies", "individual competencies", "core competencies", "specific competencies", "most critical competencies" (Weng et al, 2020); "cultural competence", "intercultural communicative competence" (Padua and Gonzalez Smith, 2020).…”