2017
DOI: 10.1101/127308
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing Multiplex Genome Editing by Natural Transformation (MuGENT) via inactivation of ssDNA exonucleases

Abstract: Recently, we described a method for multiplex genome editing by natural transformation (MuGENT). Mutant constructs for MuGENT require large arms of homology (>2000 bp) surrounding each genome edit, which necessitates laborious in vitro DNA splicing. In Vibrio cholerae, we uncover that this requirement is due to cytoplasmic ssDNA exonucleases, which inhibit natural transformation. In ssDNA exonuclease mutants, one arm of homology can be reduced to as little as 40 bp while still promoting integration of genome e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…V. cholerae mutants were constructed by MuGENT and natural transformation as previously described 17,38,39 and derived from the El Tor isolate E7946 40 . In short, transforming DNA was constructed using splicing-by-overlap extension PCR and transformed or co-transformed into strains 38,39 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…V. cholerae mutants were constructed by MuGENT and natural transformation as previously described 17,38,39 and derived from the El Tor isolate E7946 40 . In short, transforming DNA was constructed using splicing-by-overlap extension PCR and transformed or co-transformed into strains 38,39 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recombineering system described here is the first effective and simple strategy for targeted and markerless genome-editing in S. oneidensis, yielding a high efficiency of recombinant formation that permits screening for desired mutations in the absence of selection. Our system was developed without strain engineering, however rational removal of single-strand exonucleases could potentially enhance efficiency as shown in V. cholera (Dalia et al 2017) and E. coli (Mosberg et al 2012;Costantino & Court 2003;Li et al 2013). In chapter IV, we show that coupling the recombineering system developed here with the cutting edge CRISPR/Cas9-technology (Ronda et al 2016;Yan et al 2017), enables facile isolation of recombinants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This difference may be due to the inefficiency in co-transformation of multiple different DNA molecules versus a single molecule electroporation, but possibly other factors such as the difference in promoter type and plasmid copy number and/or stability. Although our system was developed without strain engineering, rational removal of single-and double-strand exonucleases could potentially enhance the frequency of recombineering as shown in V. cholera (Dalia et al 2017) and E. coli (Mosberg et al 2012;Costantino & Court 2003;Li et al 2013).…”
Section: Large-scale Genome Engineering Using Recombineering Coupled mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All V. cholerae and S. pneumoniae mutant strains were generated by SOE PCR and natural transformation, cotransformation, or MuGENT exactly as previously described (Dalia, 2018; Dalia et al, 2014; Dalia et al, 2017). For a list of all primers used in strain construction see Table S2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%